All normal people. Like all normal people - is it worth it? All normal people realize that they are normal

Since childhood, we have been instilled in various ways with the attitude “be like everyone else.”

Everyone does it, so you should do it too. "Why"? - asks the child. “So as not to be a black sheep, so as not to be laughed at!” - he hears in response.

This is how the fear of being different from everyone else, the fear of being ridiculed, is gradually implanted in us. But does “everyone” always do the right thing? Is the majority always right? And in general, is a person who is “like everyone else” happy? Let's look at a few situations that happened in the lives of my friends (names have been changed).

Olya liked her long hair. And her best friend gave herself a bob haircut because it was fashionable. She began to convince Olya, and in the end she also gave herself a bob. A little time passed, and the girl began to regret her luxurious hair, especially since the fashion for long hair came, she began to grow it, but her hair grew slowly... She acted like everyone else, just to keep up with fashion, and as a result she lost her individuality and acquired regrets .

Someone will say: well, hair is a trifle... Then let's look at another example.

Anya is a smart and beautiful, but lonely girl. Her peers have been dating guys for a long time and laugh among themselves at Anya, because she doesn’t even try to attract the attention of guys with bright makeup and seductive clothes. They even talk about the fact that Anya will remain alone all her life with her modesty and inaccessibility.

But the result was not at all what her peers predicted. They tried to attract the attention of guys with their figure, appearance, they did not develop the good qualities of their character, did not work on themselves... And, attracting only the superficial, they received the same superficial temporary relationship along with disappointment and tears.

Anya wears elegant clothes of normal length, and when guys see her, they understand that this girl is for a serious, not an easy relationship. Yes, she does not attract as many guys as her peers with bright makeup and miniatures attract, but she attracts worthy young men, which all girls dream of! Anya married just such a guy - a faithful, loving, hardworking guy who doesn’t smell of alcohol or tobacco. She didn’t act like everyone else, and in the end she was happy! And her peers scold the boys and cannot understand why they, the beauties, are abandoned.

And one more example. Once Ira read a book for girls, based on Christian principles, which talked about what a girl should do to be happy. One of the most common mistakes, it was said there, is that girls try to keep a guy by entering into an intimate relationship with him before marriage. Ira was delighted with the principles set out in the book and gave me the same one, for which I will always be grateful to her! She was ready to do as it was written there. But, having left to study in another city, she began to communicate with a nice guy who does not know God and acts like everyone else. As a result, she disregarded all the principles in that book and began to live with him without being his wife. At first everything seemed fine, but not for long. He left somewhere, and she found correspondence with another girl on his computer. When he found out that his secret was revealed, he begged for forgiveness on his knees, and she forgave, but he still did not remain faithful to her. Now she is alone with a broken heart. She had everything: beauty, intelligence, knowledge, opportunities... But she neglected God's principles that He gave us to make us happy.

I did as God advised, and He gave me the best husband in the world, a real prince, with whom we have been together for 7 years, loving, handsome, kind, talented and honoring his Creator.

God loves you very much! He really wants to give every girl the best for her! Just please choose to act not like everyone else, but as God says, and you will be happy!

Alexandra Grishchenko

In this article we will talk about “normal people”. Can each of you consider yourself normal? Who is this normal person anyway?

It is believed that normal people experience positive emotions most of the time.

If they are sad, they do not do it without a good reason - maybe a loved one has passed away, or a big trouble has occurred.

A “normal person” is not subject to irrational worries and does not feel inexplicable fear. All his mental activity is rational and balanced. He is always full of energy, clearly knows what he wants from life, rarely doubts and always has a ready-made solution for everything.

Most of us want to be “normal.” And in our thoughts we often compare ourselves with some abstract “healthy”, “normal” person.

You often hear:

“Such thoughts cannot occur to a normal person”

“Since I feel sad for no reason, something is wrong with me.”

In this article I will prove that there is nothing normal about the so-called “normal person”. That, probably, there are no normal people at all!

The image of a “normal” person was formed due to the development of mass culture with its idealized, glossy characters, as well as due to the influence of certain views in psychology.

Most schools of psychology are based on a mechanistic philosophy. This philosophy views a person as a kind of mechanism with different, separated parts. She believes that some parts of our psyche are “wrong”, “pathological”. From her point of view, there are memories, emotions, thoughts, states of consciousness that are “problematic”, “abnormal” and therefore must be corrected or deleted.

“You know which people never doubt anything? These are the ones who wrap themselves in explosives and blow themselves up in crowded places!”

Penetrating into the public consciousness, such a way of thinking gives rise to ideas about “undesirable” emotions, “bad” thoughts, and forms the image of “normal” and “abnormal” people.

Another possible reason for this perception of “normality” is the activity of the multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industry. Drug manufacturers benefit from maintaining the belief that some aspects of our psyche are pathological. Coupled with the lack of available information about natural methods of dealing with anxiety, insomnia, and bad mood, this belief receives great reinforcement.

But can many of our thoughts and feelings really be considered painful deviations from the norm, which prevail only among a few? Let's try to figure this out.

“Bad thoughts” only come to the minds of abnormal people

Canadian psychologist Stanley Rathman conducted a study on students who were considered “healthy” by all indicators. It turned out that almost each of the subjects from time to time had thoughts about sexual violence, perversion, as well as blasphemous ideas, pictures of violence against old people or animals.

Other studies have demonstrated that 50% of all people seriously consider suicide at least once in their lives (Kessler, 2005)

Where are all these “normal people”? After all, it is believed that negative thoughts are not normal! But everyone has them.

Anxiety is something abnormal!

Anxiety is a natural evolutionary mechanism. An anxious expectation of danger (even where there is none), panic that manifests itself in involuntary moments, more than once saved a person in the jungles and deserts of antiquity, full of threats and dangers.

“…about a third of all people (but most likely more) have at some time suffered from what is called a “mental illness”…”

Why then do some people tend to be overly anxious and some people don’t? American psychotherapist David Carbonell, again, refers us to evolutionary psychology, arguing that in each tribe, in the interests of everyone's survival, there had to be both people with an increased propensity for risk and people who were overly anxious. The first type of people supported the tribe in hunting and wars, where uncompromising courage was required. The second type helped the tribe survive by anticipating threats and preventing unnecessary risks.

Of course, excessive anxiety does not always lead to anxiety disorders, although it may become one of the prerequisites for the occurrence of this problem. But this is not something “abnormal” or rare.

According to statistics, up to 30% of people experience anxiety disorders at any time in their lives! 12 percent of humanity suffers from specific phobias, and 10 percent suffer from social anxiety. And in the USA and Europe these numbers are even higher!

Depression and other illnesses

Statistics on depression vary from country to country. For example, in Japan the percentage of people who experience chronic sadness is 7%. And in France – 21% (!). Approximately 8% of people experience eating disorders - anorexia and bulimia.

4 percent of adults have attention deficit disorder. But I believe that due to the very vague diagnostic criteria and controversy surrounding this diagnosis, these numbers may be underestimated. It seems to me that if we take into account the modern pace of life, then there are many more people with poor concentration, uncontrolled motor activity, impulsiveness, and constant haste.

Constant happiness is the “normal human state”

A normal person supposedly always experiences positive emotions.

But if we look at the data I cited above, it turns out that about a third of all people (but most likely more) have at some time suffered from what is called “mental illness”!

“...for some reason, the number of people suffering from mental disorders is growing at the same pace as the development of the pharmaceutical industry!”

If we talk about deviations not in a clinical, but in an everyday context, then we can emphasize that almost all people from time to time are visited by uncontrollable, irrational thoughts, “unreasonable” changes in mood, fears and doubts.

It is a myth that a “normal” person never doubts! Do you know which people never doubt anything? These are the ones who wrap themselves in explosives and blow themselves up in crowded places! They are always confident in everything and do not experience great pains of choice.

As psychologist Joseph Ciarocci said: “Mentally ill, abnormal - these are just words from the human language. No one should be considered sick or healthy. We are all in the same human boat."

Life in general is a complicated thing, as British psychotherapist Russ Harris says: “It’s unlikely that anyone will ever say to me: “My life is too easy, there aren’t enough difficulties in life!”

And Buddha generally said that “all existence is permeated with suffering.”

Life is full of difficult trials, tragic events, stress, torment, pain, aging, death. And these things accompany all people, regardless of their status, material well-being, or health.

Mental suffering is an indispensable part of our lives, and not a shameful exception to the rule, not a shameful deviation.

Pain, sadness, despondency are normal!

And a person will learn to cope with this suffering only when he stops being ashamed of it, strenuously hiding it, suppressing it and suppressing it.

We've been taught to look at it as a "thing that shouldn't exist" in our "normal world." We do not recognize what does not correspond to the image of a “normal person”; we try with all our might to push it out of the framework of our everyday existence.

Therefore, according to statistics, half or most people with mental problems do not seek timely help: they are embarrassed, afraid, or do not admit it at all, or believe that it is not for them (“only crazy people resort to psychological help!”).

Therefore, when unpleasant emotions or thoughts come, people try hard to suppress them. Stop feeling. Stop thinking. Surely each of us has been repeatedly given advice: “Don’t be afraid!”, “Just don’t think about it!” Rave! It has been proven that attempts to suppress emotions or get thoughts out of your head paradoxically lead to the opposite result: there are even more unwanted emotions and thoughts.

Therefore, for many people it has become the norm to take pills for every reason: after all, anxiety, sadness, irritation are not normal! This shouldn't happen! But for some reason, the number of people suffering from mental disorders is growing at the same pace as the development of the pharmaceutical industry!

And I want to give one more quote from Joseph Ciarocci:

“In Western culture, it is common to suppress bad emotions and focus on good ones. Many self-help and popular psychology books claim that if you have a positive outlook on the world, you can do anything: earn millions of dollars, beat cancer, and eliminate stress from your life.

Parents often tell boys that they "shouldn't" feel fear and girls that they "shouldn't" feel anger. Adults pretend that everything in their lives is perfect. What we do know is that many people actually have surprisingly high levels of depression, anxiety and anger.

Perhaps the words of Henry Thoreau are true: “most people live lives of quiet desperation.” We are faced with a paradox: We as a society have been trying to become happier for decades, but there is still no evidence that we are actually becoming happier."

~My translation of the quote from the book “CBT Practitioner’s Guide to ACT”

The quote is only gloomy at first glance. It doesn’t mean that happiness is impossible. She simply states the fact that the practice of avoiding (or even tabooing) negative emotions and trying to “think positively” in Western culture does not justify itself. It seems that the more we try to live without unpleasant emotions, stress, negative experiences, the more unhappy we become.

And maybe it’s time to change tactics, since it’s not working? Maybe it's time to move towards recognizing unpleasant emotions as a fair part of life? Make friends with your sadness, anxiety, anger! No, don’t indulge them at all, but simply pay attention to them, stop denying them, convincing yourself that we “shouldn’t experience them.” Just learn to accept them as natural properties of human nature, as temporary phenomena, as natural phenomena of the inner world, as an integral attribute of life, which goes through both joys, successes, and through sorrows and suffering. Accept and let go.

In conclusion, I would like to make an interesting note about the so-called “shamanic disease.” This is an example of how the concept of “norm” differs across cultures.

Obsessive delirium or shamanic disease?

This example is taken from the book by E.A. Torchinov "Religions of the world and the experience of the beyond."

In cultures where shamanism is developed, there is such a thing as “shamanic disease.” What it is? This is a whole set of different symptoms: constant headaches, anxiety, nightmares, auditory and visual hallucinations that some members of the tribe experience.

What would we do with such a person? They would immediately treat him, trying to eliminate any symptoms of this disease, and isolate the “sick” person from society. But for shamanic cultures, this is not a problem that requires immediate resolution, not a disease that is “treated.” This is a guarantee of a person’s chosenness, evidence of his future destiny.

It is the one who has encountered the “shamanic disease” who will become the future shaman. The most interesting thing is that all these unpleasant symptoms disappear after shamanic initiation. But during the initiation itself, on the contrary, they become greatly aggravated.

Indeed, during initiation, the future shaman is immersed in a trance with the help of rhythmic chants, ceremonies and psychoactive substances. He experiences deep transpersonal experiences, which can sometimes be very frightening. Many survivors talk about unknown, terrible entities that tear the shaman’s body into pieces and then put it back together.

But after the ceremony, the future shaman, taking on his role, gets rid of frightening symptoms. He feels incredible relief, a kind of spiritual renewal. And this is where his torment ends.

The interesting thing here is that, unlike Western culture, they do not try to suppress hallucinations, drown them out with “inhibiting” drugs. On the contrary, they try to strengthen them as much as possible, to bring them to the extreme during the ceremony. Trying to plunge a person into the very pool of his hidden fears and manias.

I'm not trying to say that our culture's approach to treating schizophrenia is necessarily bad or wrong, or that shamans are actually right. I just wanted to demonstrate how conditional and relative the concepts of “norm” and “deviations” can be.

Although, let me highlight here my own assumption regarding the shamanic disease. If we discard all mysticism, then the meaning of all these ceremonies may be as follows.

It is quite possible that the shaman does not have any magical abilities(I do not deny them, but simply put them outside the brackets of these arguments). It’s just that, as a rule, this is a rather sensitive person who has a very close connection with his unconscious. And in it rest all the archaic images, pictures of demonic and divine battles, concepts about spirits and ancestors, which a person, having become a spellcaster, already transmits to his fellow tribesmen through his rituals.

And it is very likely that such a person may experience certain problems and incomprehensible symptoms during adolescence (mental illnesses often occur in “sensitive” people). And when he is selected for initiation, he will be subjected to, one might say, exposure (a practice that is used in many psychotherapeutic methods and consists in the fact that a person is exposed to contact with the subject of his phobias) within the framework of these rituals. And through cathartic experiences, through meeting his own fears, the shaman is freed from these hallucinations.

And even if the symptoms persist, it is much easier for a person to accept them, because he is not told that he is “sick” and “abnormal.”

What do you think about the phenomenon of shamanic disease? I would be glad if you share this in the comments. I'm very interested in discussing this issue.

“Normal people are only those whom you know little,” Adler said. Considering that Alfred Adler is the founder of the individual system, it makes sense to listen to his point of view. However, first of all, it is necessary to define the terminology, and, in particular, the very concept of normality. In medicine (including) the norm is understood as a certain state of the body that does not harm its functions. Psychiatrists define a normal state as a set of indicators that correspond to certain expectations and ideas.

Sigmund Freud's attitude towards Alfred Adler was initially quite loyal, but in later letters the founder of psychoanalysis called Adler paranoid, claiming that he put forward “incomprehensible” theories.

In principle, based on this alone, we can say that a “normal person” is quite flexible, largely dependent on the value judgments of other people who consider themselves normal. Of course, since we are talking about social interactions, the opinion of society must be taken into account, but we must not forget that even a very large number of people can make mistakes. This is especially noticeable in the example of medieval scientists, who faced severe rejection of their discoveries and ideas, and some were even executed.

Adler was right

However, if you still imagine that there are relatively objective criteria for the normality of a particular person, Adler’s statement will indeed be true. This means that the less is known about a person, the fewer manifestations of his individuality, from which one can get an idea of ​​whether he is normal. In addition, insufficiently close acquaintance deprives you not only of information about significant events and actions in the life of this person, but also information about his motives, experiences, emotions and desires, both obvious and hidden, suppressed.

It is necessary to understand the difference between the social concept of norm and the individual one. In many cases, people who fall outside of social norms make excellent targets for interpersonal communication.

At the same time, most people unconsciously profess the concept of positive thinking, in other words, they assume that a person is normal until proven otherwise. Naturally, the more formal the communication, the lower the likelihood of obtaining evidence of a particular deviation. On the other hand, you should not go to extremes and generalizations and suspect everyone of psychological deviations, based on one quote from a German psychologist. Do not forget that the generally accepted definition of normal may well differ from your own, especially since it is very vague, and what was considered abnormal fifty years ago no longer surprises anyone today. Of course, in cases where mental abnormalities are obvious and dangerous to others, it is necessary to take urgent measures, but a harmless fascination with African butterflies, for example, is hardly a cause for concern.

The mayor of Gdansk, Poland, invited a Russian family whose car was stoned by unknown assailants. He apologized to them.

This is wonderful. A real man's act, proving that normal people exist everywhere. An act of strength, not weakness. Our respect. pic.twitter.com/ActsFH4Lau

“Behind every great man there is a great woman” - and the success story of the Irish UFC fighter Conor McGregor confirms this rule. He became a champion in two weight categories at once, and now his fortune is measured in millions. However, after the historic victory, Conor said in an interview that all this success would never have happened if not for the support of his beloved.

“For me, “to be like all normal people,” as the average person, the bourgeois, imagines it, is, of course, the highest insult. To be different is your right. Your right to preserve yourself the way you want to be. And if it is not related to molestation or violence, no one has the right to dictate what you should be like. If you defend yourself, your right to be yourself in this cruel and terrible world, of course, you are a winner. I have often faced and continue to face rejection of myself - as soon as they didn’t call me! I perceive any desire to correct or trim me as violence against myself and, of course, I desperately resist.

I do not accept any homophobia, any segregation, any racism, because these are all links in the same chain. When you stand up for your right to be who you are, you stand up for the rights of all minorities and all people who are different from “normal.”

The norm for me is the highest insult."

A good reputation usually pays too much: oneself.
Friedrich Nietzsche
This phrase was preserved in his drafts and sketches of the summer of 1882 (F. Nietzsche, Complete Works in 13 volumes, vol. 10, p. 46. (Cultural Revolution, 2010).

For the sake of a “correct” reputation, you have to adapt to others, do what others think is right. That is, to assent to time. Only for this you often pay with your own essence. I would rather choose my conscience than such a reputation. I would like to live without succumbing to the hustle and bustle, without adapting to some format (I hate this concept). For me, the criterion of a person’s depth has never been external indicators. Amount of money. Success is a very modern, vile word that says nothing about the essence of a person. Whether he is smart or stupid, kind or evil - if he is “successful” it does not matter at all. I try to resist the general opinion, but I live in this time, and conflicts with it are inevitable.

Novikov L.B., Apatity, 2014

The USA and Western Europe have raised new fascists in Ukraine! To get rid of them, they all must be expelled to the West, and those who are caught must be tried in a public court with a list of all the atrocities they have committed. Let Europe know whom it has warmed “on its chest”!
The US burned Vietnamese people with napalm. Now, with the hands of fascists, they are burning Ukrainians. Any normal person should not agree with this!

P.s.: Today, 05/07/2014, Euronuws announced that the United States and the European Union have given the Kiev ruling junta the full right to destroy all those who do not agree with its regime, including residents of South-Eastern Ukraine. Consequently, the West has approved the physical destruction of people fighting modern Ukrainian neo-fascism.
05/08/2014 The United States is the biggest bitch in the world: it started a civil war in Syria because poison gases were stored there, and immediately allowed the Kiev junta to use the gases against those who disagree with it! It is imperative to check whether the gas used by the Kyiv fascists is not of Syrian origin!

I would like to offer you excerpts from the preface of the writer Grigory Klimov to one book: “Social and biological conditions necessary for the existence of a normal person.”
I read with great interest.
I would like to know your opinion.

"NORMAL PERSON

The norm does not arise on its own, out of nowhere. The norm has initial data. Such initial data are the environmental conditions (physical, plant, animal and social world) in which the organism lives and functions. The external environment and its requirements lay down the biological conditions and requirements for the norm, forming the norm.
Based on the conditions and requirements of the external environment (habitat), we will consider the norm. It can be of several types.
The norm could be:

1. genetic.
2. biological.
3. anatomical.
4. functional.
5. mental.
6. social:
7. individual;
8. family;
9. generic;
10. collective;
11. production;
12. union;
13. state;
14. public;
15. universal.

1. born from mentally normal parents;
2. raised by a socially normal person;
3. lives in a socially normal society;
4. carries out socially normal activities.

But being in a normal social environment, a normal person develops socially normal.

Level and type of public morality

Type of public morality - this is the morality of normal people, and this can be the morality of deceivers, murderers, rapists, masochists, thieves, necrophiliacs, arsonists, and so on.

Public level morality - this is the quantitative ratio in society (in percentage) of the norm and perverts of one type.

In an immoral society, even a person with a norm psychotype cannot remake society and impose his socially normal values ​​on it. The society of perverts will absorb him and impose their morals on him. Only a normal person with a high level of conscience is able to critically evaluate other people's morals and self-critically their own, to realize normal morals and actively offer them to the perverted society. Perverted morals are always active, and their activity is always higher than the activity of a normal person.
As we see, the morals of a perverted society (perverts) are stronger and mostly triumph, especially if a normal person is not aware of his own normality and does not value social normality. The most dangerous and most terrible thing that leads to the degeneration of the norm is that the norm is not socially aware of the meaning of its normality.

The number of normal people in a society determines the level of normality of society, and the number and type of perverts influence to perversity society and a type of perversity.

Level of social morality

The level of social development of conscience, or the level of social morality of a society, determines a person’s moral formation and awareness of morality. A person's conscience is manifested in his morality. Conscience is guided by the biological principle “do no harm to your neighbor.” The physical bearer of morality is not society as such, but people in society who have a conscience. The number of people in a society who have a high level of conscience determines the morality of the society.

For people with a high level of conscience, society, the demands of society are secondary, the demand of his internal (biological) conscience is primary, and he brings this demand (his internal demand of conscience) to society in the form of social awareness of morality, and he enlightens society, and he creates social progress for society, not society for it.

Level of faith, beliefs, views, ideology

Public faith is based on the average social psychotype. If there are most normal people in a society, then people’s beliefs are normal. In this case, people believe in love, in family, in their parents and in their children. If a perverted type prevails in society, then people’s faith is perverted. Such a society believes that family is slavery, children are degenerates, love is the stupidity of idiots, happiness is a deception for fools.
And if in a perverted society there is still both conceptual intelligence and conceptual knowledge, then its “thinkers” provide “reasonable” evidence of why children are degenerates, the family is slavery, and happiness is deception.
The greater the percentage of people with a perverted psychotype in society, the more difficult it is for a normal person to defend himself, his faith, his beliefs, his worldview, his views. Especially when a normal person does not have a normal ideology, the ideology of a normal society. In this case, he is forced to turn to religion and in it, as in principle the exponent of the idea of ​​​​the normality of man and humanity, to seek his own path of truth (which, by and large, in matters of human relations, religion does), which is extremely important in the darkness of perverted social needs.

Level of social abilities and social opportunities

If we consider people and social groups, then there are people who want to work, create, love, give birth, raise, live and continue life. Their claims are aimed at creation, knowledge, love, education and continuation of life. Whether society provides them with such an opportunity or not, they still carry out this activity themselves, in this social activity they assert themselves.

There are people who want to deceive, to be deceived, who want to live in a world of deception, and they want nothing else. And their claims in life are built on the desire to deceive.

Let humanity perish, let the Earth perish, let the solar system perish, let the Universe perish, but pathological The needs of perverts must be satisfied and celebrate. Now, if a normal person does not understand this danger, if a society of normal people does not realize this, then, in fact, people will die, society will be destroyed, the Earth will be destroyed, and with the growth of knowledge and technology, both the Solar System and the Universe will be destroyed.

Unlike perverts, a normal person is able to give society the social abilities that society needs.
The social needs of society change, but a normal person is biologically and socially more flexible, more capable (socially more adapted). A perverted person is not flexible, he is only capable of satisfying his perverted needs, regardless of the social capabilities and social needs of society.
It is very difficult for a normal person to be normal in a society of perverts, and it is no less difficult to support a society of perverts who do not want to work and live off their labor, do not want to create material values, but want to deceive, kill, destroy, rape, steal, set fire, and wander. and beg.

Socially normal society

It is very important to know in what society a normal person realizes his normal mental image and his normal social way of life and activity.

If a person lives in a normal society, he will have a normal lifestyle and activity.

A normal society is a society that:

1. lives according to the moral laws of a normal person (has a conscience and is guided principle of “do no harm to man” and humanity"), has a social normal conscience - the morality of the norm as the morality of society;
2. lives according to the morals of the norm, has social mores, norms - work, knowledge, development and improvement, love, happiness, preservation, reproduction and distribution;
3. has systematic, reliable and true knowledge that serves for the benefit of the individual and the entire society - this is a public worldview;
4. successfully uses knowledge to satisfy the normal needs of man and humanity - this is social intelligence and its orientation.

In a normal society, a person is able to satisfy his normal needs, he is able to function normally mentally and realize himself normally socially.
Perverted Society

If a person does not live in a normal society, but in a society led by perverts and imposing their perverted needs on the whole society - the morals of perverts, then in this case morals, morals, worldview and public intelligence change.

Perverts impose a perverted understanding of conscience - the conscience of perverts. Perverts direct public knowledge for satisfaction perverted needs and use public intelligence to successfully solve their perverted problems - this is a perverted society. This means that even if a person has a normal mental and normal social image of his activities, but lives in a society that has started a war, he is forced to become a killer. He is forced to live the lifestyle of a killer, otherwise he will not survive, he must protect his life, protect the interests of the killers and satisfy the needs of the killers - to kill. This could be a society of thieves, a society of rapists, a society of deceivers, a society of sufferers, and so on, and it could also be a mixture of several perverted social values ​​that are imposed on society by a group of perverts of several pathological psychotypes.

In a perverted society, perverted morality, perverted conscience and perverted activity triumph.

Socially normal activity

Only under the condition that a person is genetically normal, has a normal level of conscience, normal needs, high intelligence, is honest by nature, grows up and is brought up in a normal environment, lives in a normal society, is ideologically aware of his normality - only such a person is capable of realizing normal social activity.

1. He is able to correctly navigate in space and in himself.
2. Able to accurately isolate and identify an object and its movement (it is objective).
3. A normal person is able to make movements without errors and successfully move towards an object (attraction), he responds adequately to the demands of the environment.
4. A normal person is able to reliably perceive information, cognize the true object, truthfully preserve it and honestly transmit it to the external environment (study, research, communicate, design - imagine).
5. A normal person is capable of rationally using and transforming an object (external environment) to satisfy the needs of the body (reflexes, needs, conscience, etc.) without damaging the environment itself.
6. It is reasonable to ensure the satisfaction of physiological needs for the normal functioning of the body (its organs and systems).
7. Preserve your life without destroying the lives of other people, the plant, animal and physical world. Productively fight and assert your social values.
8. Skillfully encourage and intelligently punish yourself and those around you living a normal life.
9. A normal person is capable of carefully accumulating and preserving social and genetic knowledge.
10. Only a normal person is capable of transmitting social and genetic knowledge reliably and without distortion. A normal person is capable of teaching young people skillfully, competently and productively.
11. Only a normal person can engage in reproduction (reproduction, upbringing, caring for children) efficiently, normally and with pleasure.
12. A normal person is able to effectively spread, move and explore new territories, using social knowledge and intelligence for the benefit of earthly civilization.

Normal human activity is carried out in a joint and harmonious mental complex:

1. at the level of an individual cell or multicellular organism (at the level of characteristics, influences, relationships and movements);
2. at the level of reflexes (at the level of properties and actions);
3. at the level of need (physical image and behavior);
4. at the level of concepts (abstract concepts and lifestyle and activities)."