Why is everyone talking about World War 3? How will the third world war begin?

At one point, the world decided that the likelihood of a new world war was close to zero. Among the arguments were that no one needs such a war, that it could cause the death of all life on the planet, etc. However, we should not forget that very serious and sudden changes occurred in 1991.

The whole world watched the process of the collapse of the USSR, and hoped that they had finally managed to get rid of the fear of the outbreak of the third world war, and now they could live quite calmly. But while the army of the former USSR was falling apart, the enemy army was only increasing its military power.

There is a concept of “economic justification for the army.” This means that if there is an army, there must be a certain economic sense in it. That is, an army can be created to protect the country from various external threats, so the costs of its maintenance become inevitable. Also, the need to form an army may be due to the need to obtain certain benefits of an economic and/or political nature. If we consider both of these grounds in relation to the US Army, then its existence is explained precisely by the second of them. After the USSR collapsed and its army began to rapidly degrade, the American army not only did not cease to exist, but also began to develop at an unprecedented pace, which allowed the United States to protect its interests far beyond its borders. And there is nothing surprising in this, since this is the only way to obtain an economic justification for the existence of such a military-industrial complex. As a result of this, the United States single-handedly won the title of superpower, and in a very short period of time, it actually turned into a mega empire.

What is meant by the term "empire"? This concept contains not only the presence of a strong army and economy, as well as the desire and, most importantly, the OPPORTUNITY to dictate one’s will to any country, but also the process of transforming this will into an “imperial” state. This means that the country itself and the entire people of the “empire” must completely rethink their essence, accept the “imperial” type of thinking, and also accept the corresponding changes in all spheres of their lives, incl. and in foreign policy.

The Empire cannot have competitors. Any of Putin’s thesis about a “multipolar world” can be regarded as a challenge. The essence of modern America lies in the new invention of anti-Russian propaganda, like “Putin is to blame for everything!” After all, history has many examples of what the Empire did to those who did not submit to it and challenged it. Milosevic, Hussein, Gaddafi - they were all destroyed. Currently, the same threat actually hangs over Assad and Putin. Therefore, we can say that US foreign policy is currently largely aimed at physically removing Putin from its path. At the same time, America has two ways to destroy Putin: either on the basis of a coup d’etat (only Putin himself will suffer), or on the basis of military action (part of Russia will also be destroyed).

It is worth noting the excessive exaggeration of the danger posed by a possible nuclear explosion. The fact is that there are huge differences between a nuclear explosion and what, for example, happened in Chernobyl. Since the invention of such weapons, hundreds of tests have taken place on the planet. Moreover, in different parts of our planet, both atomic and nuclear, hydrogen, and neutron bombs exploded. But the planet calmly withstood this; no mass deaths from radiation sickness were recorded. However, we did not mention the huge number of underground and underwater controlled explosions. That is why it is rational to talk about exaggerating the danger from the use of nuclear weapons by strategic missile forces. It should be understood that its main task is the action of a shock wave, and not the scattering of radioactive substances, which happened at Chernobyl.

According to fairly rough estimates, so many similar bombs have already been detonated on earth that their simultaneous use could destroy all life on the planet. Therefore, we can conclude that this fact is significantly exaggerated, because the earth has not been destroyed, and you and I are still living. Undoubtedly, conventional tests were carried out in closed testing areas away from people. It is also indisputable that in the event of war a huge number of human lives will be lost. In each new world war, a “record” was set for the number of deaths, and at present there is no reason to assume that in the event of a new war this pattern will be broken.

Also, regarding the expression “a nuclear war is impossible, because after it everyone will die,” one can also object to something. Firstly, it is a well-known fact that at the very beginning of the Cold War, the joint efforts of the United States and England developed the Dropshot plan, which involved launching an atomic strike on the Soviet Union. But this plan was not implemented solely due to the lack of a sufficient number of atomic bombs to guarantee victory. They finally decided to forget about this plan when the Soviet Union acquired its own atomic weapons and long-range strategic aviation.

Secondly, the moment the first atomic bombs appeared in the USSR marked the beginning of the arms race. At the same time, we can talk about such a degree of passion on both sides for this race that nuclear warheads were mounted on almost everything that was at hand: artillery shells, mortars, anti-aircraft missiles. It is likely that the military of that time wanted to be sure that after the start of a nuclear war no one should survive. Based on this madness that then gripped the military of both countries, I would advise you to be more careful in statements regarding the fact that “a nuclear war is impossible solely due to the fact that no one will decide to use such weapons,” since such military personnel can expect everything.

Another fact worthy of attention is that from the moment weapons of mass destruction appeared in the arsenal of these countries, generals began to look for the most effective ways that would destroy the enemy without allowing a retaliatory strike, or minimizing the consequences of it. It is safe to say that the Pentagon currently has several similar scenarios.

However, it is necessary to think about what is in their power? One example of such a scenario is called large-scale sabotage. It will affect many things: decision makers, main starting points. It is likely that chemical or bacteriological weapons or an electromagnetic pulse will be used. There is also the concept of “decision time”. In the event of a strike against Russia's Strategic Missile Forces at close range (which is why NATO seeks to place its bases closer to Russia), there will be practically no time needed to decide on a retaliatory strike. However, it is not a fact that Perimeter will be able to eliminate the threat.

This means that if one of the American missile defense systems begins to operate effectively, we can talk about the inevitability of a strike on Russia. Otherwise, the meaning of its invention and placement is lost. Are you sure that several missiles will still be able to break through and hit the target? As mentioned above, any scenario already includes certain losses.

What is the point of the United States attacking Russia? Firstly, of course, huge resource potential. With a high degree of probability, in the next 100-150 years there will be a serious struggle for resources. The American people have always been practical, so they easily thought through everything in advance.

Secondly, today China is increasingly gaining momentum to become another superpower, and Russia is currently the only one who can help China in this. Therefore, after the destruction of Putin, the States will immediately be able to kill three birds with one stone: the elimination of their main competitors - Russia and China, as well as access to almost limitless reserves of natural resources. This will mean that the Empire created by the Americans will exist smoothly for hundreds of years, which is very tempting.

Thirdly, if China and Russia make joint efforts, they can easily end the hegemony of the world currency - the dollar. Let us note that such plans have existed for a long time, and some have even already been announced. After all, the national currency is America’s main strategic resource, as well as the key to their global leadership.

Fourth, US global dominance is strengthened not only by the status of the dollar, but also by the threat of using the US army. The power of the United States is based on weapons and money, and the very fact of the existence of such an organization as BRICS, in which Russia is given a leading role, calls into question America’s global dominance. Note that many types of Russian weapons are more effective than their American counterparts. As Russian weapons proliferate across China and India, the United States may face new challenges in the future. Therefore, right now the United States can stop the activities of BRICS, because in the future this may become problematic.

If you think that the presence of S500, Yarsov, Voevod, KA-52, Almaty, etc. in service will prevent anyone from attacking Russia? However, all these new products cannot be called widespread for the Russian army. The bulk of it is equipped with scrap metal from Soviet times. Despite the refined appearance, as well as full combat capability, we should not forget that this is the 21st century. Undoubtedly, in Russia there are units fully equipped with modern military equipment, but they make up a small part of the entire army. And, to be frank, at present the Russian army is much weaker than the army of the USSR, which opposed Germany during World War II. If we take into account the totality of NATO weapons, the quantity and quality of equipment and personnel, then they are tens of times superior to us.

In addition, in the 90s the bulk of the radar stations were lost, so in fact the early warning system for missile launches stopped working. Currently, Russia is decommissioning the most formidable nuclear weapon in the history of mankind - the Voevoda nuclear missile. The Yars rocket that replaced it is not a full-fledged replacement. It is possible that the enemy will want to take advantage of such a chance.

Undoubtedly, the “probable enemy” has even more serious problems with nuclear weapons, but they are not faced with the task of completely destroying Russia - “Rapid global disarming strike” assumes that, first of all, the strike will be delivered to control points, decision-making points, and through communication centers. Moreover, such a strike does not always require nuclear weapons. Cruise missiles equipped with a conventional warhead will also be suitable for delivering a first strike. However, the likelihood of a nuclear strike is still high. If only for the reason that such actions will lead to chaos. And the presence of a missile defense system will allow them to protect themselves from a possible response.

Which allies will want to take our side? CSTO or China? I very much doubt that they will want to go to war. Especially if a blitzkrieg is really planned.

Currently, some are trying to argue that the option of military action between NATO and Russia is impossible due to the weakness of the former's forces. Allegedly, NATO forces can easily fight against weak powers, but are completely unprepared to act against Russia. This argument is interesting, but easily disputed. Firstly, many NATO members would categorically disagree with such an assessment of their combat capability. Secondly, let's try to get back to history.

During the attack on Russia in 1812, France was not faced with the task of capturing the entire country. Napoleonic troops did not have any advantage over the Russian army. The only thing they had was experience. However, Napoleon was not afraid to start a war because he hoped for lightning success. He was going to quickly defeat the Russian army, and then conclude a truce, with the signing of conditions favorable to France. Even the capture of Moscow by Napoleon was not initially planned. This was included in the plan when the French thought that Alexander would now definitely agree to the signing of peace. However, Napoleon was mistaken that Alexander would want to sign peace. The Russian emperor was ready for a long war, but the French one was not.

Wilhelm's war with Serbia in 1914 began on the basis that he assumed that England, France and Russia would refuse to participate in hostilities. Germany and the Triple Alliance did not have any advantage over the Entente, but Wilhelm still decided to begin military action. Unfortunately for him, he was also wrong. The Entente countries nevertheless decided to enter the war, and Germany turned out to be incapable of conducting combat operations on several fronts at the same time. As a result of military actions, Russia did not receive any benefits, but the fact remains that the country that started the BIG war did not intend to lose, but lost because of its miscalculation.

Hitler's plan to capture Moscow was designed to take 2 months. Germany had no serious advantage over the Soviet Union, only in experience, as well as in Hitler's serious ambitions. He called the USSR “a colossus with feet of clay.” Therefore, he was convinced that he should only be pushed a little, and then he would fall apart on his own. Hitler was confident that after the start of the war the Russian population would want to rise up against the Bolsheviks, and would be recruited en masse by the Nazis. However, a miscalculation was made here too. Nothing of the kind happened, and Germany, being unprepared for a long continuation of hostilities, lost.

From all the above historical facts, a general conclusion can be drawn - the aggressor country did not have a significant advantage over its opponents, but this did not stop it. The conclusion may even be more extensive, because, in fact, the aggressor countries were actually not ready for war, since they expected to solve the necessary problems in a short period of time. That is why we can say that the assertions that NATO countries are not ready for war, therefore it will not happen, are untenable.

Also, some argue that war is impossible because it is unprofitable for big international business. However, a potential alliance between China and Russia could undermine the Western system of global governance. To understand how the Western elite feels, we need to understand a few things. If you are part of this elite, then you have virtually unlimited financial resources. The fact is that they only need a few tens of millions of dollars to live. This is a drop in the bucket compared to their capital. Now let's imagine that they manage to earn that amount in a week. Indeed, at a certain moment, when such an elite has already tried everything, their only task becomes power, to achieve which they can make a variety of sacrifices. Several hundred thousand victims on the other side of the planet will not be an obstacle for them. Therefore, taking into account the above, it is inappropriate to talk about the concept of “loss of benefit” in this context.

They say that “no one has the desire to fight” because “the level of mutual understanding is so serious that war is simply impossible,” because as a result of the war “all economies will be destroyed.”

Firstly, in the above historical examples, mutual understanding of economies was also at a fairly high level. However, the parties broke off relations and imposed sanctions. This has continued throughout history, and there is no reason to believe that anything will change significantly now. Throughout history, wars have been started by states whose economies simply could not withstand the war (with the exception of America). Despite the fact that this seems absurd, each country wanted to win the war very quickly, preparations were made for it, equipment was built, people were trained. A similar situation occurs now.

Formally, none of the world leaders says they want war. Why did wars still arise? The fact is that sometimes someone gets to lead a country who expects to seriously intimidate others, or to quickly carry out military operations on foreign territory. When such people managed to come to power, they managed to convince almost the entire population of their country of the correctness of their judgments.

In this case, we cannot talk about any rationality in politics. If history did not contain facts about many aggressive and insane politicians, then there would not be facts about many terrible wars. Now, having compared all the facts, we can say that all the efforts of Napoleon, Wilhelm or Hitler were doomed to failure in advance. However, at that time they were extremely confident in their victory and enjoyed complete confidence from the people.

The situation that has arisen today can most objectively be compared with the period of the First World War. Then, too, all countries, it would seem, did not want the development of hostilities, but, despite all this, they were preparing for war, not accepting treaties, and presenting rivals only with ultimatums.

You can also hear people saying, “What war? Americans don’t think about Russia at all, most of them don’t even know where it is.” And these arguments are used to convince oneself that “war is impossible.” But I would like to argue something about this.

Yes, ordinary Americans today have absolutely no attitude towards Russians, but it is worth noting that at the moment Washington is not tasked with pumping up the American people with hatred of Russians as much as possible. Today, Ukraine and Syria are first in line for slaughter. When might the States decide to change their plans? When the fact of their world domination will be under real threat, and the fall of the dollar will also begin to approach. At the moment there are no prerequisites for this, although perhaps we do not know everything. But if such preconditions arise, Americans are easily ready to go to the extent of protecting their well-being and their currency from the “wild and always drunken Siberian barbarians.”

For those who don’t know, here are some simple statistics. More than 5 thousand American soldiers died during the special operation in Iran. And these statistics only affect the army. And this was all done solely to overthrow Hussein, and so that some American companies would have the opportunity to make money. There were no threats to the States themselves, but Washington easily decided to sacrifice the lives of more than 5 thousand of its citizens, and the rest of the Americans did not even reproach their government for this. Now is it worth thinking about if we are talking about something more serious?

Let us also recall that Obama has more than once called Putin “the main evil” that exists in the modern world. So, it is safe to say that the process has already begun and the countdown has begun.

Some say that Russia will be impossible to completely conquer due to its vast territory. So this is not required. The case will follow the following scenario: economic attack, “fifth column”, instability in the social sphere, destruction of military facilities. The result of this will be the independent collapse of the country into uncontrollable conglomerates, which, as a result of the influence of the “democratic world community,” will become several more submissive, weak and vulnerable states.

True, the attack must be explained by a certain pretext, but if we take into account the number of conflicts that occur along the perimeter of Russia’s borders, a pretext can be found quite quickly.

The unreliability, danger and riskiness of the plan also seem to be rather implausible versions that there will be no war. Germany has been the economic and cultural leader of Europe for two centuries, but it was she who started world wars twice. Moreover, in both cases, its rulers blindly believed in their victory. Everyone thought it was a great country with smart and disciplined people. But those who thought so were wrong, twice.

Another example is Napoleon, who was considered a genius at the time. It was thanks to him that the United Europe project was developed and implemented. It was during his reign that the metric system was introduced and the Civil Code was adopted. He was characterized by versatile thinking, and he was surrounded by the same people. However, despite all this, one day the thought occurred to him that he would be able to conquer Russia. Obama is much stupider than Napoleon, although it is not the American president who will make such a decision.

One of the characteristics of human nature is that people often make similar mistakes without learning anything from past experience. Today no one can confidently say that somewhere someone is not proving to someone that the conquest of Russia in a year - six months - a couple of months is quite realistic.

Why conduct military operations if Russia can be destroyed by economic measures? Yes, thanks to America’s efforts, the ruble collapsed, and Russian raw materials depreciated several times, but it is very unlikely that the West is seriously aimed at creating a “Maidan” in Moscow. This also means that the presence of economic and social problems in Russia can only become another explanation for the Western invasion there. And the whole world will believe that “democracy” has dealt a blow to “totalitarianism.”

If you think this is crazy, then remember the extermination of millions of Jews during World War II. Then it also seemed like madness, and no one wanted to believe in it. However, Hitler killed thousands of Jews every day in Auschwitz alone. Thus, all of Germany believed that they were a “supernation” and the whole world would grovel before them. Although this seems crazy, history is full of such examples.

We all consider this madness, because we think in completely different categories than those who make decisions for us. They are distinguished by their ruthlessness and mercilessness towards their subjects. They base themselves on the same principles when choosing their methods and goals.

Oh yes. Article title. I believe that a third world war is impossible because none of the “ordinary people” want it. I cannot find any other arguments for this judgment. I can't think of a single historical example where the "opinion of the people" actually played a role for any government and could stop it.

And finally, I would like to say that all the talk about World War 3 so far is only reasoning and discussion of “probability”. In fact, there are such a huge number of options that it is almost impossible to predict anything. Already many times in the world there was a threat of another BIG war, but each time this did not happen. But this cannot mean that this trend will continue and more mentally ill people will not come to power. Based on this, even a probability of about 10-20% of the theoretical outbreak of war is quite frightening. And in this case, how not to be afraid, because only fools are not afraid of anything.

Talk about the beginning of the Third World War is heard more and more often, some even argue that it is already being waged in a hybrid form. What do the prophets say about this? In Russia, Vanga’s prophecies are well known, but in the world she is rarely quoted, probably due to Russophilia. We offer you predictions from popular Western clairvoyants on this topic.

The Third World War will not happen without Russia

1. Predictions of a 90-year-old Norwegian woman Gunhild Smelhus(Gunhild Smelhus) from Valdre

In 1968, Pastor Emmanuel Tollefsen-Minos (1925-2004) is one of the most influential evangelical preachers in Norway. “The third war will be the biggest catastrophe in history, it will not be marked by political crises and will begin unexpectedly,” said Smelhus. “The prosperity of Europe and an illusory sense of security will force people to move away from religion: churches will be empty and turn into places of entertainment.” The value system will also be changed: “People will live as husband and wife, although not in marriage”; “paternity before marriage and adultery in marriage will be natural”; "TV will be full of violence, so brutal that it will teach people to kill."

World War 3 could be the biggest disaster

Smelhus called a wave of immigration one of the signs of the approaching war: “People from poor countries will come to Europe, they will also come to Scandinavia and Norway.” The presence of migrants will lead to tension and social unrest. "It will be a short and very brutal war, and it will end with an atomic bomb." "The air will be so polluted that we will not be able to breathe. In America, Japan, Australia - rich countries - water and soil will be destroyed." “And those living in rich countries will flee to poor countries, but they will be as cruel against us as we were against them,” says the notes of the Norwegian pastor.

2. The Serbian seer is very popular in the Balkans Mitar Tarabić(died 1899)

- a peasant from the village of Kremna. He said that he heard voices in his head that told him about the fate of his people and the world. In his prophecies, he also saw “columns of refugees on the Serbian borders.”

“In this war, scientists will invent the most diverse and strange cannonballs. Exploding, instead of killing, they will bewitch all living things - people, armies, livestock. Under the influence of this witchcraft they will sleep instead of fight, but then they will wake up again "."Us (Serbs. - Ed.) will not have to fight in this war, others will fight over our heads,” said Tarabić. According to the seer, the final conflict will affect most of the globe: “Only one country at the end of the world, surrounded by seas and as big as our Europe, will live in peace and without problems." What kind of country is this, reader, guess for yourself.

It is interesting that his descendant Jovan Tarabić, who died in 2014, that the main battle will take place between Russia and Turkey. As a result, Constantinople will again become Orthodox, and “the Russian people will liberate all Orthodox and Serbian lands.”

3. Bavarian prophet Matthias Stromberger(Matthias Stormberger) (1753-?)

was an ordinary shepherd. He said that after the end of the Second Great War there will be a “third general fire.” “The third war will be the end of many nations. Almost all countries will take part in it, millions of people ... they will die despite the fact that they are not soldiers. The weapons will be completely different ". “After the great last war, a large farm could be bought for two or three gold coins,” Stromberger described the post-war world.

4. Another German clairvoyant, also from Bavaria, - Alois Irlmayer (1894-1959),

fountain builder - helped search for those missing in action during the war. He saw “pictures” of events from the future. “The world will explode suddenly, but it will be preceded by an exceptionally fertile year,” he said. Two numbers must be associated with the date the war began - 8 and 9.

"Armed Forces of the East (Muslim troops. - Ed.) They will move on a broad front to Western Europe, there will be battles in Mongolia... The People's Republic of China will conquer India. Beijing will use its bacteriological weapons during these battles... Five million people in India and its neighboring countries will die. Iran and Türkiye will fight in the East. There will be a revolution and civil war in Russia. There will be many corpses on the streets, no one will clean them up. Russians will again believe in God and accept the sign of the cross. How long this will all last, I don't know. I see three nines, the third brings peace. When it's all over, some people will die, and the rest will fear God."

5. The seer is very popular in the USA Albert Pike (1809-1891)

- American soldier, poet and high-ranking Freemason, founder of the Church of Satan. In a letter dated August 15, 1871, to the Italian freemason and revolutionary Giuseppe Mazzini, Pike described the behind-the-scenes of three world wars. He predicted World Wars I and II as the invention of the Illuminati. Pike saw the Third World War as a conflict between Israel and the Muslim world.

"This war must be waged in such a way that Islam and the State of Israel mutually annihilate each other." Although the existence of the Illuminati is seen by some as a conspiracy theory, Pike wrote in the late 19th century: "We control Islam, and we will use it to destroy the West."

According to Pike, the world after World War III will represent the kingdom of Lucifer. “The people, having become disillusioned with Christianity, whose ideological spirit from now on will be without a compass to indicate the direction, will receive the pure teaching of Lucifer,” the Satanist wrote.

6. Let’s finish the review with the predictions and prophecies of the Bulgarian clairvoyant Vanga.

Russians believe her because her prophecies turned out to be surprisingly accurate. As for the Third World War, just before her death, when asked about the beginning of the war, she answered: “Syria has not yet fallen.” From here the conclusion is that Syria cannot be allowed to fall, which is what Russia is doing.

Whether a third war is about to break out or, as some argue, is already being waged in the form of smaller conflicts, it will undoubtedly lead to the destruction of humanity. Albert Einstein said the following about this: “I do not know what weapons will be used during the Third World War, but the fourth will be fought with sticks and stones...”

In our turbulent times, when every day there are loud statements from the powers that be about building up military potential, tensions with neighboring countries, when crises, terrorist attacks, and local conflicts have become almost the norm, people ask themselves the question: will there be a full-scale third world war?

Now truth is mixed with fiction, good with evil, science with metaphysics. This has led to the fact that even skeptics-atheists begin to listen, although not always openly, to various prophecies.

Here we would like to structure existing predictions, opinions, forecasts on the topic of the third world war. And then invite readers to draw their own conclusions.

Millionaire, unofficial sponsor of “color revolutions”, a man with the cunning and intelligence of the devil himself, George Soros, who, thanks to his intuition, made a fortune through speculation on the stock exchanges, reported on the inevitability of revenge between East and West.

He means China, along with “its secret and obvious ally, Russia,” and Japan and South Korea, allies of the United States, as well as all NATO countries.

“Then the world will be on the verge of a new, nuclear war” .

Moreover, he is confident that victory will be China’s. Therefore, at a meeting of the World Bank, he recommended "make concessions to the Chinese government", “allow the yuan to become a global currency.”

By the way, the main office of the Rothschild family fund (which has long had a reputation as a lender to various obscure schemes, people in different countries, enterprises) was for the first time actually moved to another part of the world - namely from New York to Hong Kong. The gold and foreign exchange reserves and documents also moved with him. Isn't this an indirect indication of the future winner?

Mystics, prophets, clairvoyants

The question of whether a nuclear war will be worth asking those people (living or long dead) who have already proven the accuracy of their predictions in other things. For example, Aloys Irlmayer.

He made them in 1953, during the era of the decline of destroyed Germany. And how surprised were his contemporaries at his stories about his homeland, which had become rich and attractive to emigrants. As well as “It will be very warm in the world” – a hint of global warming? “People from the Balkans, Africa and the East” will come to Germany – current migrants.

He also reported that the popular German currency would depreciate sharply.

Afterwards, the Bear and the yellow Dragon will invade to fight the Eagle from the west. The explosion will destroy Prague. After this, the rulers will finally sit down at the negotiating table.”

Aloisa Irlmayer

It is curious that the destruction of Prague by the “climate gun,” which no one even knew about in those days (1980s), was also mentioned by another clairvoyant - American Veronica Luken.

She spoke about the war between the USA and Russia (and this was in the era of disarmament, the idea of ​​fraternity, the Nobel Peace Prize to Gorbachev and other hopes for peaceful coexistence.

Luken urged not to believe this.

After the end of World War 3, people will abandon technology and licensed weapons and “begin to live a spiritual life, working with a plow on the earth.”

He predicted the outbreak of World War II, fires in Russia and drought in Europe.

Michel Nostradamus composed his predictions in the form of poetry. They hint at the territory of the “Great War” - modern Europe. Events will take place from 2040 to 2060.

By the way: Nostradamus has many parallels with the predictions of Alois Irlmayer. Although the latter did not name a specific date for the start of the war - “I don’t see it.”

Revered by all Orthodox Christians, Matrona of Moscow predicted the fall of the monarchy in Russia, the civil war and the Great Patriotic War.

He spoke about the new war like this: it will not exist as such. But at the same time, “there will be a redistribution of the countries of the East between world powers.” During this, the price of oil will fall and the ruble will be in crisis, but then it will rise again. But the European currency will not be destined to become popular again as before.

Another Russian psychic, Juna, also charges with optimism: “There will be no third world war. I'm absolutely sure".

Putin about the third world war

Conclusion

Unfortunately, world history is the history of wars. They act as a catalyst for the formation of new countries, discoveries (remember the Internet, which was originally created to help the military), and types of administrations.

The war “raised” future rulers and politicians. Probably, this century will not be an exception. Both prophets from the distant past and quite modern world analysts speak about this.

Nobody knows when exactly the third world war will begin. They all either name different dates or don’t name them at all. Perhaps this is a sign to us about the variability of fate and the existing opportunity to avoid the shedding of blood.

Write in the comments what do you think? Will there be a third world war? Or not?

Endless terrorist attacks, ongoing armed conflicts, and ongoing disagreements between Russia, the United States and the European Union indicate that peace on our planet is literally hanging by a thread. This situation is alarming for both politicians and ordinary people. It is no coincidence that the issue of starting the Third World War is being seriously discussed by the entire world community.

Expert opinion

Some political scientists believe that the mechanism of war was already launched several years ago. It all started in Ukraine, when a corrupt president was removed from office and the new government in the country was called illegitimate, and simply a junta. Then they announced to the whole world that it was fascist and they began to scare one sixth of the land with it. First mistrust and then outright enmity were sown in the minds of the people of the two fraternal peoples. A full-scale information war began, in which everything was subordinated to inciting hatred between people.

This confrontation was painful for the families, relatives, and friends of the two fraternal peoples. It has reached the point where politicians in the two countries are ready to pit brother against brother. The situation on the Internet also speaks to the danger of the situation. Various discussion platforms and forums have turned into real battlefields where everything is permitted.

If anyone still doubts the likelihood of war, they can simply go to any social network and see the intensity of discussions on topical topics, from information about oil prices to the upcoming Eurovision Song Contest.

If it is possible to quarrel two fraternal peoples who have shared grief and victory for more than 360 years, then what can we say about other countries. You can call any nation an enemy overnight by preparing timely information support in the media and the Internet. This is what happened with Turkey, for example.

Currently, Russia is testing new methods of war using the example of Crimea, Donbass, Ukraine, and Syria. Why deploy multimillion-dollar armies, transfer troops, if you can carry out a “successful information attack”, and to top it off, send a small contingent of “little green men”. Fortunately, there is already positive experience in Georgia, Crimea, Syria and the Donbass.

Some political observers believe that it all started in Iraq, when the United States decided to remove the allegedly undemocratic president and carried out Operation Desert Storm. As a result, the country's natural resources came under US control.

Having gained a little fat in the 2000s and having carried out a number of military operations, Russia decided not to give in and prove to the whole world that it had “rose from its knees.” Hence such “decisive” actions in Syria, Crimea and Donbass. In Syria, we protect the whole world from ISIS, in Crimea, Russians from Bandera, in Donbass, the Russian-speaking population from Ukrainian punitive forces.

In fact, an invisible confrontation has already begun between the United States and Russia. America does not want to share its dominance in the world with the Russian Federation. Direct proof of this is present-day Syria.

Tension in different parts of the world, where the interests of the two countries come into contact, will only increase.

There are experts who believe that tension with America is caused by the fact that the latter is aware of the loss of its leading position against the backdrop of a strengthening China and wants to destroy Russia in order to take possession of its natural resources. Various methods are being used to weaken the Russian Federation:

• EU sanctions;
• decline in oil prices;
• involvement of the Russian Federation in the arms race;
• support for protest sentiments in Russia.

America is doing everything to ensure that the situation of 1991, when the Soviet Union collapsed, is repeated.

War in Russia is inevitable in 2018

This point of view is shared by the American political analyst I. Hagopian. He posted his thoughts on this matter on the GlobalResears website. He noted that there are all signs of the US and Russia preparing for war. The author notes that America will be supported:

• NATO countries;
• Israel;
• Australia;
• all US satellites around the world.

Russia's allies include China and India. The expert believes that the United States is facing bankruptcy and will therefore make an attempt to seize the riches of the Russian Federation. He also emphasized that some states may disappear as a result of this conflict.

Former NATO leader A. Shirreff makes similar forecasts. For this purpose, he even wrote a book about the war with Russia. In it, he notes the inevitability of a military confrontation with America. According to the plot of the book, Russia is seizing the Baltic states. NATO countries are coming to its defense. As a result, World War III begins. On the one hand, the plot looks frivolous and implausible, but on the other hand, considering that the work was written by a retired general, the script looks quite plausible.

Who will win America or Russia

To answer this question it is necessary to compare the military power of the two powers:

Success in war depends not only on superiority in weapons. As military expert J. Shields said, the Third World War will not be like the two previous wars. Combat operations will be carried out using computer technology. They will become more short-term, but the number of victims will be in the thousands. Nuclear weapons are unlikely to be used, but chemical and bacteriological weapons as an auxiliary means are not excluded.

Attacks will be launched not only on the battlefield, but also in:

• areas of communications;
• Internet;
• television;
• economics;
• finance;
• politics;
• space.

Something similar is now happening in Ukraine. The offensive is on all fronts. Blatant disinformation, hacker attacks on financial servers, sabotage in the economic field, discrediting politicians, diplomats, terrorist attacks, shutting down broadcast satellites and much more can cause irreparable damage to the enemy along with military operations at the front.

Psychic predictions

Throughout history there have been many prophets who predicted the end of humanity. One of them is Nostradamus. As for world wars, he accurately predicted the first two. Regarding the Third World War, he said that it would happen due to the fault of the Antichrist, who will stop at nothing and will be terribly merciless.

The next psychic whose prophecies came true is Vanga. She told future generations that World War III would begin with a small state in Asia. The fastest is Syria. The reason for military action will be an attack on four heads of state. The consequences of the war will be terrifying.

The famous psychic P. Globa also said his words regarding the Third World War. His forecasts can be called optimistic. He said that humanity will end World War III if it prevents military action in Iran.

The psychics listed above are not the only ones who predicted World War III. Similar predictions were made by:

• A. Ilmayer;
• Mulchiazl;
• Edgar Cayce;
• G. Rasputin;
• Bishop Anthony;
• Saint Hilarion and others

In our turbulent times, when the news line every day brings us new information about events in Ukraine, Syria or the DPRK, the question increasingly arises: “Will there be a 3rd world war in 2019?” This terrible event became especially noticeable after the recent bombings of the United States, France and Great Britain in Syria.

And all this is happening against the backdrop of cooling relations between the two largest powers in the world - Russia and the United States. The leaders of these states no longer restrain themselves in their expressions.

Where it all started

Experts have differing opinions on this issue. Some believe that the deterioration of relations between the United States and Russia began with V. Putin’s Munich speech. Then he condemned the American authorities for starting conflicts around the world. In 2007, the President of Russia stated that the Russian Federation is no longer a weak state and therefore does not agree with a unipolar world. He also noted that the Russian state will no longer tolerate when several leading powers unjustifiably use force against other countries to solve their geopolitical problems.

At the same time, V. Putin called the policy of European states puppet. Many experts called our leader's speech the beginning of a new Cold War.

Journalist P. Brooks from America wrote at the time that Mr. Putin should be thanked. Now there is no doubt about Russia's intentions. Everything became extremely clear - the “Russian bear” decided to return.

Deterioration of relations due to Ukraine

In 2014, Russia annexed Crimea. Thus, according to some political scientists, Russia has violated its international obligations and the existing world order. This led to a new round of deterioration in relations with the West. V. Putin’s Crimean speech was again compared to the Munich speech. In it, the President of the Russian Federation said that Russia will always protect the Russian-speaking population, no matter where it is. This was regarded in Western countries as a new threat. NATO countries have become.

After this, Russia supported the liberation movement. The new republics were provided with comprehensive assistance, including military assistance. This further angered the US and Europe. Sanctions against Russia came into play. They were tied to the Minsk agreements to resolve the situation in Ukraine.

Further aggravation with the West

Then in 2014, V. Putin’s Valdai speech took place, where he openly stated that the “Russian bear” would not give up the taiga to anyone. At the same time, he noted that some people in the world are trying to put the bear on a chain, but this will never happen.

Every year, tensions between Russia and Western countries escalated with renewed vigor. Russia never ceases to show the whole world that it is no longer a weak state and must be taken into account. In the first decade of the 2000s, the Russian Federation had enormous income from the sale of oil and gas. European countries began to depend on it for energy. At the same time, modernization of weapons took place. Russia began to supply large quantities of weapons to other countries, such as:

• Saudi Arabia;
• Syria;
• Iran, etc.

Against this background, there was a war with Georgia, as a result of which the state formations of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, dependent on Moscow, appeared.

In general, the United States and NATO countries realized that the Russian Federation is not going to give up, and clearly stands for a multi-polar world, against American dictate to other states.

According to the Russian leader, the US monopoly control of the entire world does not lead to anything good. There are enough states in the world that also have the right to participate in world affairs. Their industrial potential is comparable to America and the EU:

The situation is heating up to the limit

The United States, together with its Western partners, does not want to take into account Russia’s point of view. They are also unhappy with rapidly developing China. The last two years have shown that there are fewer and fewer points of contact with the Russian Federation. Russia, which took an active part in Iran's nuclear program in the nineties, continues to support this regime. There is quite a lot left for this state to begin producing missiles with nuclear warheads. If Russia helps this country, this could escalate tensions with Israel.

The Russian Federation also supports the North Korean regime. The leadership of this country constantly threatens Japan and the United States. Unstable conditions on the Korean peninsula could lead to difficult situations throughout the region, including:

• Russia;
• South Korea;
• China;
• and Japan.

Relations with the West were complicated by Russia's interference in the elections of the United States, Germany and France.

The last straw of patience was the incident with the Skrepal family in Salisbury. Father and daughter were poisoned with a chemical of unknown origin. Although, Western experts are sure that this is Russia’s business. The European public is seriously alarmed that harmful nerve gas, which is banned in the world, could easily get into Europe. Its exposure could endanger large numbers of people.

In connection with recent events, Western countries are also going to impose new sanctions on Russia.

Risk of World War over Syria

As you know, there has been a civil war in this country for several years. Government troops are supported by Russia, and opposition forces are supported by Western countries. The Syrian army has repeatedly used chemical weapons to suppress enemy forces. Its latest use in the Duma aroused the wrath of the world community. The US President called the leader of this country an “animal” who does not spare the civilian population and poisons them with chemicals. In order to prevent violations of basic human rights to life, Western countries carried out targeted missile strikes on places where chemical substances were manufactured and developed.

Russia, regarding the upcoming escalation of the situation in Syria, announced the convening of the UN Security Council. She tried to urge the leaders of the main world powers not to rush into airstrikes, but to deal with the current situation. Russian experts believe that there was no chemical attack, but a staging of the desired result. An agreement was reached with the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons that it would come to the city of Duma and conduct a thorough investigation. However, the coalition of Western countries did not wait and launched strikes on Syria.

At this time, the world held its breath in anticipation of something terrible. After all, in this confrontation the Russian and US Armed Forces and allies could collide. Thus, Vanga’s predictions about the beginning of the Third World War could come true. Before her death, the fortuneteller said that there would be a confrontation between the Russian Federation and the United States, which would end in a global war. In her forecast, she clearly said that world war will happen when Syria falls.

Putin's answer

The Russian President harshly condemned the act of rocket attack on Syria, which occurred in violation of all the rules of the world community. There was no vote at the UN. The actions of the USA, Great Britain and France were not even discussed in the parliaments of these states. The Russian state, represented by V. Putin, expressed concern about the violation of the rights of a sovereign state. V. Putin called missile attacks against Syria a crime against humanity.

What historians say

Anyone who remembers the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 draws a parallel between it and the current missile attack on Syria. Just like 56 years ago, the world found itself on the brink of nuclear war. By pure chance, no servicemen of the Russian army were injured. Who knows, maybe if this happened, a military confrontation between Russia and the United States would begin. Only God knows how this could end.

At the same time, the US President said that this is not the last shelling of Syrian territory. In addition, the American authorities have already announced new sanctions against the Russian Federation for supporting the misanthropic Assad regime.

No one can say with certainty to what extent relations between the United States and Russia will worsen. God grant that everything ends with peace and negotiations in 2019.

In general, in 2019 there are still a lot of hotbeds of tension that could develop into a large-scale war:

• Ukraine;
• Syria;
• DPRK;
• Iran - Israel.