Who led the Russian troops and the Tatar troops. Which of the Tatar khans led their army during the campaign against Rus'? Lev Gumilev about the Tatar-Mongol yoke

History of naval art

Battle of Kulikovo

Supreme Ruler of the Golden Horde Mamai was amazed by the defeat of his troops on the Vozha River: the army was defeated, the rich “Russian ulus” was lost.

Mamai decided to restore the “right” of the Golden Horde to this “ulus” and raise the shaky authority of the Tatar “invincibility”, undermined Russian victory on the Vozha River. Preparing for a new campaign against Moscow, he united everything Tatar army under his leadership, and executed those who opposed this order. Then he called upon mercenaries to help the Tatar army - Turkic-Mongol tribes from beyond the Caspian Sea, Circassians from the Caucasus and Genoese from the Crimea. Thus, Mamai gathered a huge army, reaching 300 thousand people. Finally he got on his side Lithuanian Prince Jagiello , fearing the rise of Moscow. Ryazan Prince Oleg also expressed his submission to Mamai and promised, together with the Lithuanian prince, to act on the side of the Tatars against Moscow.

Summer 1380 Mamai at the head of an army of thousands, he launched a campaign against Moscow with the goal of its final defeat and subordination to the Golden Horde. The robber motto of the Tatar hordes read: “Execute the obstinate slaves! Let their cities, villages and Christian churches be ashes! Let’s enrich ourselves with Russian gold.”

Having transported his troops across the Volga, Mamai led them to the upper reaches of the Don, where he was supposed to unite with the troops of Jagiello and Oleg.

When Moscow Prince Dimitry Ivanovich received news of Mamai's movement to Rus', he energetically set about preparing the defeat of the Tatars. He sent messengers to all the principalities with the order that all princes immediately go with their troops to Moscow. The Russian people, harboring a burning hatred for the enslaving Tatars, warmly responded to the patriotic call of the Moscow prince. Not only princes and their squads went to Moscow, but also peasants and townspeople, who made up the bulk of the Russian army. Thus, in an exceptionally short time, the Moscow prince managed to gather an army of 150 thousand people.

Dimitri Ivanovich convened in Moscow military council of princes and governors to whom he offered his plan to defeat the Tatars . According to this plan, Russian troops were supposed to advance towards the enemy, seize the initiative into their own hands and, without allowing the enemy to join forces, defeat him piece by piece. The council approved Prince Dimitri's plan and scheduled the gathering of troops in Kolomna.

By the end of July, most of the Russian troops were already concentrated in Kolomna. Here Dimitri Ivanovich reviewed his troops. Then he allocated a strong reconnaissance detachment led by experienced warriors Rodion Rzhevsky, Andrei Volosaty and Vasily Tupik and sent it to the upper reaches of the Don. The task of the reconnaissance detachment was to determine the enemy’s strength and the direction of its movement. Without receiving any information from this detachment for a long time, Dimitri Ivanovich sent a second reconnaissance detachment for the same purpose.

On the way to the Don, the second detachment met Vasily Tupik, who was returning to Kolomna with a captured “tongue”. The prisoner showed that Mamai was slowly moving towards the Don, waiting for the Lithuanian and Ryazan princes to join him. The union of opponents was supposed to take place on September 1 near the mouth of the Nepryadva River, a tributary of the Don.

Having received this information, Dimitri Ivanovich convened a military council, which decided to immediately begin the movement of Russian troops to the Don in order to defeat the main forces of Mamai before the remaining opponents approached him.

On August 26, Russian troops left Kolomna and moved along the left bank of the Oka River to the southwest. Two days later they reached the mouth of the Lopasnya (a tributary of the Oka), where on the 28th they crossed to the right bank of the Oka and went straight south. Such a route fully corresponded to the political and strategic considerations of the Moscow prince, who did not want to make the transition to the Don through the lands of the Ryazan prince Oleg.

Dimitri Ivanovich knew that Oleg had betrayed the interests of his freedom-loving people to the enslaving Tatars, so he sought to make his transition to the Don secretive and unexpected for the traitor-prince. Oleg was convinced that the Moscow prince would not dare to oppose Mamai and would “run away to distant places” during the Tatar campaign against Moscow. He then wrote to Mamai about this, hoping to receive from him the possessions of the Moscow prince.

On September 5, the advanced cavalry detachments of the Russians reached the mouth of the Nepryadva, where two days later all the other troops arrived. According to intelligence reports, Mamai stood three passages from Nepryadva, near Kuzmina Gati, where he was waiting for the Lithuanian and Ryazan squads. As soon as Mamai learned about the Russians’ arrival on the Don, he decided to prevent them from crossing to the left bank. But it was already too late.

On September 7, Dimitri Ivanovich convened a military council to discuss the issue of crossing the Don. The raising of this issue at the military council was not accidental, for some of the princes and governors spoke out against crossing the Don. They were not confident of victory over an enemy that was numerically superior to the Russian army, which, if forced to retreat, would not be able to escape from the Tatars, having a water barrier behind them - the Don. In order to persuade his hesitant military leaders to cross the Don, Dimitri Ivanovich said at the council: “Dear friends and brothers! Know that I did not come here to look at Oleg and Jagiello or to protect the Don River, but to save the Russian land from captivity and ruin or to lay down my head for Rus'. An honorable death is better than a shameful life. It was better not to speak out against the Tatars than to go back and do nothing. Today we will go beyond the Don and there we will either win and save the entire Russian people from death, or lay down our lives for our homeland.”

Dimitri Ivanovich’s speech at the military council in defense of offensive actions with the aim of destroying the enemy’s manpower corresponded to the desire of the Russian people and their armed forces to put an end to the enslaving Tatars. The council's decision to cross the Don also had an extremely important strategic importance , that it gave the Russians the opportunity to keep the initiative in their hands and beat their opponents piece by piece.

On the night of September 8, the Russian army crossed the Don, and in the morning, under the cover of fog, it lined up in battle formation. The latter corresponded to the current situation and the tactical features of the Tatar military operations. Dimitri Ivanovich knew that the main force of Mamai’s huge army - the cavalry - was strong with crushing flank attacks. Therefore, in order to defeat the enemy, it was necessary to deprive him of this maneuver and force him to launch a frontal attack. The decisive role in achieving this goal was played by the choice of battle position and skillful formation of battle formation.

The position occupied by Russian troops for a decisive battle with the Tatars was on the Kulikovo field. It was bounded on three sides by the Nepryadva and Don rivers, which in many places had steep and steep banks. The eastern and western parts of the field were intersected by ravines, through which flowed the tributaries of the Don - Kurts and Smolka and the tributaries of the Nepryadva - Sredny and Nizhny Dubyak. Beyond the Smolka River there was a large and dense Green Dubrava. Thus, the flanks of the Russian troops were reliably protected by natural barriers, which significantly limited the actions of the Tatar cavalry. Five regiments and a general reserve of Russian troops were formed in battle formation on the Kulikovo field. stood in front guard regiment , and behind it at some distance advanced regiment under the command of governors Dimitry and Vladimir Vsevolodovich, which included army on foot Velyaminova. Behind him was big regiment , consisting mainly of infantry. This regiment was the basis of the entire battle formation. At the head of the large regiment were Dimitri Ivanovich himself and the Moscow governors. To the right of the large regiment was located right hand regiment under the command of Mikula Vasiliev and princes Andrei Olgerdovich and Semyon Ivanovich. Left hand regiment led by the princes of Belozersky stood to the left of the large regiment near the Smolka River. These two regiments consisted of horse and foot squads. Behind the large regiment was located private reserve , consisting of cavalry. Behind the left flank of the battle formation, in Zelenaya Dubrava, a strong ambush regiment (general reserve) , which consisted of selected cavalry under the command of Prince Serpukhovsky and boyar Bobrok Volynets. To observe the Lithuanian prince was sent reconnaissance squad.

This location of Russian troops on the Kulikovo field fully corresponded to the plan of Dmitry Donskoy - to destroy the enemy with a decisive battle.

Based on the current situation on the Kulikovo field, Mamai was forced to abandon his favorite method of attacking the flanks and accept a frontal battle, which was extremely unfavorable for him. In the center of the battle formation of his army, Mamai placed infantry, consisting of mercenaries, and cavalry on the flanks.

From 12 noon the Tatar army began to approach. According to the custom of that time, the battle began with the heroes. Russian hero Alexander Peresvet entered into combat with Tatar hero Temir-Murza. The heroes set off their horses to gallop towards each other. The blow of the warriors who collided in the duel was so strong that both opponents fell dead.

The clash of the heroes was the signal for the start of the battle. The bulk of the Tatars, with a wild cry, rushed to the advanced regiment, which boldly entered into battle with them. In the leading regiment there was also Dimigry Ivanovich, who moved here even before the start of the battle. His presence inspired the warriors; with them he fought to the death.

The Russians courageously repulsed the onslaught of Mamai’s brutal hordes, and almost all the soldiers of the guard and advanced regiments died a brave death. Only a small group of Russian soldiers, together with Dimitri Ivanovich, retreated to the large regiment. A terrible battle began between the main forces of the opponents. Relying on their numerical superiority. Mamai tried to break through the center of the Russian battle formation in order to destroy them piece by piece. Straining all their strength, the large regiment held its positions. The enemy attack was repulsed. Then the Tatars attacked with their cavalry the regiment of the right hand, which successfully repulsed this onslaught. Then the Tatar cavalry rushed to the left flank, and the regiment of the left hand was defeated; retreating to the Nepryadva River, he exposed the flank of a large regiment. Enveloping the left flank of the Russian troops, the Tatars began to move into the rear of the large regiment, while simultaneously intensifying the attack from the front. But with this approach, the enemy put the flank and rear of his cavalry under attack from an ambush regiment hidden in Green Dubrava and patiently waiting for the right moment to deliver a crushing blow.

“...Our hour has come. Be brave, brothers and friends!” - addressed Bobrok to the troops of the ambush regiment and gave the order to resolutely attack the enemy.

The elite squads of the ambush regiment, always eager to fight, quickly attacked the Tatar cavalry and inflicted a terrible defeat on it. From such an unexpected and stunning blow, confusion occurred in the ranks of the enemy, and he began to retreat in panic, pursued by all Russian troops. The panic was so strong that Mamai was no longer able to restore the battle order of his troops. He also, mad with fear, fled from the battlefield.

The Russians pursued the Tatars for 50 km and stopped only on the banks Red Sword River . Mamai's entire huge convoy was taken by the Russians.

The enemy lost over 150 thousand people in the Battle of Kulikovo, the Russians - about 40 thousand.

The Lithuanian prince Jagiello, who was going to unite with Mamai, was one passage from the Kulikovo field during the battle. Having learned about the defeat of the Tatars, he hastily withdrew his troops to Lithuania. Following Jagiello, Prince Oleg of Ryazan fled to Lithuania. His treasonous plan did not find support among the people. The population of the Ryazan principality, suffering from the devastating Tatar raids, was on the side of the Moscow prince Dimitri Ivanovich and warmly sympathized with his victory over the hordes of Mamai.

In honor of this victory, Moscow Prince Dimitri Ivanovich was named Donskoy.

conclusions

The historical significance of the Battle of Kulikovo lies in the fact that it marked the beginning of the liberation of Rus' from the Tatar yoke and contributed to the unification, centralization and strengthening of the Russian state.

The Battle of Kulikovo showed the undeniable superiority of Russian military art over the military art of the Tatars.

Dimitry Ivanovich Donskoy was an outstanding political and military figure of the Russian people.

As a statesman, he successfully solved the most important political task of uniting Russian lands around Moscow. He understood that the fight against the Tatars, as the most powerful and dangerous enemy, required the unification of the entire Russian people.

As a commander, Dimitri Donskoy showed high examples of military art. His strategy, like that of Alexander Nevsky, was active. The liberation goals of the war attracted the people to the side of Prince Dimitri, who supported his decisive actions against the Tatars. The troops of Dmitry Donskoy were inspired by the great goal of the liberation struggle against the foreign yoke, which determined the high level and progressive nature of military art in the fight against the Tatars.

Dimitri Donskoy's strategy was characterized by concentration of the main forces and means in the decisive direction . So, on the Kulikovo field against Mamai, he concentrated all his forces, and against the Lithuanian prince Jagiello - a small reconnaissance detachment.

Dimitri Donskoy's tactics were active and offensive in nature. An offensive with the aim of destroying the enemy's manpower was a characteristic feature of the military leadership of Dmitry Donskoy.

Dimitri Donskoy attached great importance to reconnaissance, reserves, as well as the interaction of all parts of the battle formation, pursuit and destruction of the defeated enemy.

The Battle of Kulikovo is a major historical victory of Russian military art over the military art of the Tatars, who were considered “invincible”.

The Soviet people honor the names of their great ancestors, carefully preserve and develop their military heritage, rich in exploits. Their courageous image serves as a symbol of justice in the struggle against foreign enslavers and inspires the people to heroic deeds in the name of freedom and independence of the socialist Motherland.

Of great importance for the development of military and naval art was invention of gunpowder and introduction of firearms. The Chinese were the first to use firearms. There is evidence that in China, cannons that fired stone cannonballs were used in 610 BC. e. There is also a known case of the Chinese using cannons in 1232 during the defense of Kangfeng Fu from the Mongols.

From the Chinese, gunpowder passed to the Arabs, and from the Arabs to the European peoples.

In Rus', the use of firearms was started by the Moscow prince Dimitri Ivanovich Donskoy. In 1382, for the first time in the history of wars in Rus', Muscovites used cannons mounted on the walls of the Kremlin against the Tatars.

The appearance of firearms in Rus' was of great importance for the development of Russian military art; it also contributed to the centralization and strengthening of the Moscow state.

Engels noted: “To obtain firearms you needed industry and money, both of which were owned by the townspeople. Firearms were therefore from the very beginning the weapon of the cities and of the rising monarchy, which relied on the cities in its struggle against the feudal nobility.”

Mongol-Tatars are all nomadic peoples living in the Volga region and further to the East, with whom Rus' fought in the 13th-15th centuries. The name was given by the name of one of the tribes

“In 1224 an unknown people appeared; an unheard of army came, godless Tatars, about whom no one knows well who they are and where they came from, and what kind of language they have, and what tribe they are, and what kind of faith they have ... "

(I. Brekov “The World of History: Russian Lands in the 13th-15th Centuries”)

Mongol-Tatar invasion

• 1206 - Congress of the Mongolian nobility (kurultai), at which Temujin was elected leader of the Mongolian tribes, who received the name Genghis Khan (Great Khan)
• 1219 - Beginning of Genghis Khan's three-year conquest in Central Asia
• 1223, May 31 - The first battle of the Mongols and the united Russian-Polovtsian army at the borders of Kievan Rus, on the Kalka River, near the Sea of ​​Azov
• 1227 - Death of Genghis Khan. Power in the Mongolian state passed to his grandson Batu (Batu Khan)
• 1237 - Beginning of the Mongol-Tatar invasion. Batu's army crossed the Volga in its middle course and invaded North-Eastern Rus'
• 1237, December 21 - Ryazan was taken by the Tatars
• 1238, January - Kolomna captured
• 1238, February 7 - Vladimir captured
• 1238, February 8 - Suzdal taken
• 1238, March 4 - Pal Torzhok
• 1238, March 5 - Battle of the squad of Moscow Prince Yuri Vsevolodovich with the Tatars near the Sit River. Death of Prince Yuri
• 1238, May - Capture of Kozelsk
• 1239-1240 - Batu’s army camped in the Don steppe
• 1240 - Devastation of Pereyaslavl and Chernigov by the Mongols
• 1240, December 6 - Kyiv destroyed
• 1240, end of December - Russian principalities of Volyn and Galicia destroyed
• 1241 - Batu's army returned to Mongolia
• 1243 - Formation of the Golden Horde, a state from the Danube to the Irtysh, with its capital Sarai in the lower Volga

The Russian principalities retained statehood, but were subject to tribute. In total, there were 14 types of tribute, including directly in favor of the khan - 1300 kg of silver per year. In addition, the khans of the Golden Horde reserved for themselves the right to appoint or overthrow the Moscow princes, who were to receive the label for the great reign in Sarai. The power of the Horde over Russia lasted for more than two centuries. It was a time of complex political games, when the Russian princes either united with each other for the sake of some short-term benefits, or were at enmity, while doing their best to attract Mongol troops as allies. A significant role in the politics of that time was played by the Polish-Lithuanian state that arose on the western borders of Rus', Sweden, the German orders of knighthood in the Baltic states, and the free republics of Novgorod and Pskov. Creating alliances with each other and against each other, with the Russian principalities, the Golden Horde, they waged endless wars

In the first decades of the 14th century, the rise of the Moscow principality began, which gradually became a political center and collector of Russian lands.

On August 11, 1378, the Moscow army of Prince Dmitry defeated the Mongols in the battle on the Vazha River. On September 8, 1380, the Moscow army of Prince Dmitry defeated the Mongols in the battle on the Kulikovo Field. And although in 1382 the Mongol Khan Tokhtamysh plundered and burned Moscow, the myth of the invincibility of the Tatars collapsed. Gradually, the Golden Horde state itself fell into decay. It split into the khanates of Siberian, Uzbek, Kazan (1438), Crimean (1443), Kazakh, Astrakhan (1459), Nogai Horde. Of all the tributaries of the Tatars, only Rus' remained, but it also periodically rebelled. In 1408, Moscow Prince Vasily I refused to pay tribute to the Golden Horde, after which Khan Edigei made a devastating campaign, robbing Pereyaslavl, Rostov, Dmitrov, Serpukhov, and Nizhny Novgorod. In 1451, Moscow Prince Vasily the Dark again refused to pay. The Tatar raids were fruitless. Finally, in 1480, Prince Ivan III officially refused to submit to the Horde. The Mongol-Tatar yoke ended.

Lev Gumilev about the Tatar-Mongol yoke

- “Batu’s army, which opposed the Polovtsians, with whom the Mongols had been at war since 1216, passed through Rus' to the rear of the Polovtsians in 1237-1238, and forced them to flee to Hungary. At the same time, Ryazan and fourteen cities in the Vladimir Principality were destroyed. And in total there were about three hundred cities there at that time. The Mongols did not leave garrisons anywhere, did not impose tribute on anyone, being content with indemnities, horses and food, which was what any army did in those days when advancing.”

- (As a result) “Great Russia, then called Zalesskaya Ukraine, voluntarily united with the Horde, thanks to the efforts of Alexander Nevsky, who became the adopted son of Batu. And the original Ancient Rus' - Belarus, Kiev region, Galicia and Volyn - submitted to Lithuania and Poland almost without resistance. And now, around Moscow there is a “golden belt” of ancient cities that remained intact during the “yoke,” but in Belarus and Galicia there are not even traces of Russian culture left. Novgorod was defended from the German knights by Tatar help in 1269. And where Tatar help was neglected, everything was lost. In the place of Yuryev - Dorpat, now Tartu, in the place of Kolyvan - Revol, now Tallinn; Riga closed the river route along the Dvina to Russian trade; Berdichev and Bratslav - Polish castles - blocked the roads to the "Wild Field", once the homeland of the Russian princes, thereby taking control of Ukraine. In 1340, Rus' disappeared from the political map of Europe. It was revived in 1480 in Moscow, on the eastern outskirts of former Rus'. And its core, ancient Kievan Rus, captured by Poland and oppressed, had to be saved in the 18th century.”

- “I believe that Batu’s “invasion” was actually a large raid, a cavalry raid, and further events have only an indirect connection with this campaign. In Ancient Rus', the word “yoke” meant something used to fasten something, a bridle or a collar. It also existed in the meaning of a burden, that is, something that is carried. The word “yoke” in the meaning of “domination”, “oppression” was first recorded only under Peter I. The alliance of Moscow and the Horde lasted as long as it was mutually beneficial.”

The term “Tatar yoke” originates in Russian historiography, as well as the position about its overthrow by Ivan III, from Nikolai Karamzin, who used it in the form of an artistic epithet in the original meaning of “a collar put on the neck” (“bent the neck under the yoke of the barbarians” ), who may have borrowed the term from the 16th-century Polish author Maciej Miechowski

from his horse..." Which of the first Kyiv princes
According to legend, this is how he ended his life?

A)
Igor

C)
Vladimir

D)
Rurik

2. “Our land is great
space and rich in grain, but there is no state structure in it. Go to
for us to reign and rule” - this is what he wrote...

A)
Metropolitan Hilarion

B)
Nestor the Chronicler

3. The first stone temple
in Rus' it was called...

A)
St. Sophia Cathedral in Kyiv

B)
St. Sophia Cathedral in Novgorod

C)
Tithe Church in Kyiv

D)
Church of the Intercession on the Nerl

4. Are the following true?
statements?

A.
A fresco is a painting with water paints on wet plaster.

B.
The construction of the first Christian churches in Rus' was led by Varangian craftsmen

A)
Only A is true;

B)
Only B is true;

C)
both judgments are correct;

D)
both judgments are incorrect.

5. Are the following true?
statements?

A.
Vladimir was the son of Svyatoslav from his concubine, housekeeper Olga Malushi, meanwhile
how Yaropolk and Oleg came from the legitimate wives of Svyatoslav.

B.
The last wife of Vladimir the Saint was Rogneda, who bore him Boris and Gleb.

A)
Only A is true;

B)
Only B is true;

C)
both judgments are correct;

D)
both judgments are incorrect.

6. Are the following true?
statements?

B.
The first saints of the Russian Orthodox Church were Boris and Gleb.

A)
Only A is true;

B)
Only B is true;

C)
both judgments are correct;

D)
both judgments are incorrect.

7. What event
happened before the others?

A)
murder of Igor by the Drevlyans;

B)
campaigns of Svyatoslav Igorevich;

C)
Oleg the Prophet's campaigns to Constantinople;

D)
Olga's reform.

8. What term is

A)
lessons;

B)
polyudye;

D)
graveyards.

9. What term is
generalizing for everyone else?

A)
nogata;

B)
cut;

D)
hryvnia

10. Which one
literary works appeared earlier than others?

A)
“The Tale of Bygone Years” by Nestor the Chronicler;

B)
“The Sermon on Law and Grace” by Metropolitan Hilarion;

C)
“Lesson for Children” by Vladimir Monomakh;

D)
"The Walk of Abbot Daniel."

11. Who from
Vladimir-Suzdal princes took Kyiv in battle and subjected the city to terrible
ruin?

A)
Andrey Bogolyubsky;

B)
Yury Dolgoruky;

C)
Alexander Nevskiy;

D)
Vsevolod the Big Nest.

12. Are the following true?
judgments about the Novgorod Republic?

A.
In the intervals between the convening of the veche, the highest governing body was the council of gentlemen,
consisting of the mayor, thousand, archbishop elected at the assembly,
Archimandrite.

B.
The prince not only did not manage state affairs, but also did not have the right to own
property in Novgorod.

A)
Only A is true;

B)
Only B is true;

C)
both judgments are correct;

D)
both judgments are incorrect.

13. Are the following statements about Tatar true?
invasion?

A. After the fall of Ryazan, the struggle
Voivode Evpatiy Kolovrat led the war against the enemy.

B. None
from Russian cities could not hold out against the Mongols for more than 10 days.

A) true
only A;

B) true
only B;

C) are correct
both judgments;

D) both
the judgments are incorrect.

14. Which of the Tatar khans led their army
during the campaign against Rus'?

A)
Genghis Khan;

C)
Subadei;

15. Metropolitan Kirill said: “My children,
know that the sun has already set on the land of Suzdal!” About the death of which prince was this true?
said?

A) Andrey
Bogolyubsky;

B) Yuri Dolgoruky;

C)
Alexander Nevskiy;

D) Vsevolod Bolshoye
Nest.

start a campaign against Rus'. The army was led by the grandson _____________ Batu

The Mongols defeated ___________________________.

The Mongols subjugated the Polovtsians and began preparations for a campaign against Rus'.

December 1237

Siege and capture of the Mongol-Tatars ___________________________________________________

January 1238

Capture of Kolomna and ______________________ by the Mongol-Tatars

Siege and capture of Vladimir by the Mongol-Tatars

The battle on the river __________________________ Russian troops led by the Grand Duke of Vladimir ________________ and Mongol-Tatar troops. The defeat of the Russian army and the death of the Grand Duke.

March 1238

The siege and capture of the shopping center _____________________. Return of the Mongol army, which did not reach 100 versts to ________________________________, to the southern steppes.

The beginning of a 50-day siege by the Mongol-Tatars of a small Russian city ___________________________________

Summer 1238

Batu's exhausted troops rested in the Don steppes.

Autumn 1238

Invasion of Batu's troops into the Ryazan land. Destruction of cities

______________________________________________________

Batu's invasion of the lands of Southern Rus'. Burning of cities ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Siege and capture of the Monogols by the Tatars ______________________

___________________________________________________

Muslim warrior from the troops of Salah ad-Din (Saladin). Describe their conversation during the hunt and feast in which each would explain the justice of their cause and predict the future outcome of the confrontation!

extraordinary intelligence and military talent. Bolotnikov promised freedom to the peasants and slaves. And people came to him and came. The rebels, led by their leader, headed towards the capital. Near Moscow, their army united with the noble rebel army. At the decisive hour, the rebels were dealt a strong blow: the nobles, led by Lyapunov and Pashkov, went over to Shuisky's side. The situation changed dramatically, and the rebels rebelled in December 1605 retreated to Kaluga. But this was not the end. Bolotnikov won a number of victories, but they did not change the course of events. The scales tipped in favor of the government troops. During one of the battles, Bolotnikov was captured and executed, and the rebels went home.

Feats, achievements and destinies from the very origins to the twentieth century

On Defender of the Fatherland Day, it is customary to remember the heroes of past years and talk about military traditions. The illustrious names of Alexander Nevsky, Dmitry Pozharsky, Alexander Suvorov, Mikhail Kutuzov and Georgy Zhukov do not need any special introduction. Another thing is the commanders, military organizers and war heroes representing the Tatar people (as well as people who influenced the formation of the Tatars). Realnoe Vremya compiled their top 25, trying to make this list reflect the complex turns and contradictions of history, without keeping silent about those figures whose position does not fit into someone’s picture of the world.

The origins of the Tatar military art

• Mode (234-174 BC)

“The Xiongnu have fast and brave warriors who appear like a whirlwind and disappear like lightning; they herd cattle, which is their occupation, and hunt along the way, shooting with wooden and horn bows. Chasing wild animals and looking for good grass, they do not have a permanent residence, and therefore are difficult to control and curb. If we now allow the border districts to abandon cultivation and weaving for a long time, then we will only help the barbarians in their constant occupation and create a favorable situation for them. That is why I say that it is more profitable not to attack the Xiongnu,” - with these words the Chinese dignitary Han An-guo convinced Emperor Wudi not to quarrel with his northern neighbor. It happened in 134 BC. A series of kaganates and empires originated from the Xiongnu (Xiongnu) empire, as a result of which the Tatar people were formed in the north of the Eurasian continent. The founder and ruler of the Xiongnu empire, Mode, was a real problem for the powerful emperors of China, who, despite all the advantages, could not do anything with the steppe enemy. For the first time, he united the peoples of the Great Steppe under a single authority and forced the Middle State to speak with itself on equal terms. Some historians believe that the title “Chinggis”, taken by the founder of the Mongol Empire Temujin, is the title “Shanyu”, which was borne by Mode, transformed over the centuries.

• Kubrat (VII century)

In the 7th century, the historical ancestors of the modern Volga-Ural Tatars - the Bulgars - emerged. The Great Bulgaria tribal association in the northern Black Sea region is headed by Khan Kubrat. To survive during the era of the Great Migration of Peoples, Kubrat had to wage constant wars with the Avar Khaganate and the Byzantine Empire. With the latter he managed to conclude an alliance. Only after the death of its founder does Great Bulgaria disintegrate. The Bulgars begin to settle in different countries, and one of their units comes to the Volga. The Pereshchepinsky treasure, found in 1912, became a monument to the power of Kubrat. Among the finds is a sword that supposedly belonged to the ruler.

• Genghis Khan (1162-1227)

The personality of this commander is of global significance, since he created the largest empire of antiquity and the Middle Ages. Our list will not be complete without him, because the tactics, strategy, organization, intelligence, methods of communication and weapons of Genghis Khan’s army continued their life in the Golden Horde and the Tatar states that arose after its collapse. The military art of the Tatar state influenced the army of Muscovite Rus'.

Photo by Maxim Platonov

When history and heroic epic went hand in hand

• Tokhtamysh (1342-1406)

In Russian historiography, this khan is known for the capture of Moscow on August 26, 1382. Many spears have been broken around the question of why, having defeated Mamai, Prince Dmitry Donskoy so easily capitulated to Tokhtamysh. However, the history of the khan, naturally, is much broader than this episode. He spent his youth in exile at the court of Tamerlane. In 1380, having finally defeated the dictator Mamai, he united the Golden Horde. Having turned out to be the most powerful of the descendants of Genghis Khan, he challenged Tamerlane. He made several successful campaigns in Iran and Central Asia, but then luck turned against him. In the battles of Kondurch on June 18, 1391 and on the Terek on April 15, 1395, he was defeated by Tamerlane, after which the Golden Horde was systematically defeated. He spent the last years of his life as an exile fighting for the throne. He died in Siberia fighting the troops of Idegei.

• Idegei (1352-1419)

The hero of the Tatar epic, banned under Stalin, was a real politician and a talented commander. He was not a descendant of Genghis Khan, but was the last one who could hold different parts of the Golden Horde as part of a single state. He started as Tokhtamysh's close associate, but then organized an unsuccessful conspiracy and fled to Tamerlane in Samarkand. He took part in the Battle of Kondurch on the side of Tamerlane, and after the battle he separated from the winner and disappeared with his army into the steppes. In 1396, Tamerlane, having completely ruined the Horde, went into his own possessions. Then Idegei and his army become the most powerful force in the devastated country. On August 12, 1399, Idegei won a brilliant victory over the troops of the Lithuanian princes Vitovt and Tokhtamysh in the battle on the Vorskla River. For almost 20 years he rules the empire through dummy khans, passes laws limiting slavery, and promotes the spread of Islam among nomads. The rule is hampered by constant wars with the children of Tokhtamysh, in one of which the old commander died.

• Ulu-Muhammad (d. 1445)

During the collapse of the Golden Horde, the Middle Volga region became an arena where different political entities measured their strength. The warring Horde khans used the Bulgar ulus as a springboard for the struggle for power in Sarai. Old cities were ravaged by Novgorod and Vyatka ushkuin pirates. Russian princes went to war here long before Ivan the Terrible. All this ended when Khan Ulu-Muhammad came to the Middle Volga. Having lost to other Chingizids in the struggle for power, he was forced to wander. On December 5, 1437, near Belev, Ulu-Muhammad managed to defeat the superior forces of the Russian princes Dmitry Shemyaka and Dmitry the Red. After this, the khan established himself in the Middle Volga, laying the foundation for the strong Kazan Khanate.

Photo by Maxim Platonov

• Sahib-Girey (1501-1551)

In 1521, after more than 20 years of Moscow protectorate, the Kazan Khanate regained full independence. This is due to the accession to the throne of Khan Sahib Giray from the Crimean Giray dynasty. Almost from the first days, the twenty-year-old khan had to wage war with a powerful neighbor, who saw Kasimov’s Khan Shah Ali on the Kazan throne. Under the command of Sahib-Girey, the Crimean-Kazan army reached Kolomna, where it met with the army of the Crimean Khan Mehmed-Girey, and the combined army almost approached Moscow. This forced Grand Duke Vasily III to change tactics and launch an attack on Kazan, using pre-prepared outposts. This is how Vasilsursk, the prototype of Sviyazhsk, appeared on the Sura River. In 1524, under the pressure of circumstances, Sahib-Girey was forced to leave Kazan, leaving the throne to his nephew Safa-Girey. In 1532 he became the Crimean Khan and carried out a major military reform. The army, organized on the basis of the Golden Horde, is being modernized in the Ottoman way. The Crimean Tatars have infantry armed with firearms and artillery.

• Chura Narykov (d. 1546)

Chura Narykov is an interesting example of a politician and military leader, who at the same time is a semi-mythical hero of the folk epic “Chura Batyr”. The more famous Idegei had the same combination. Each of these two images lives an eventful life, but there are many similarities. Both the real Karachi Bey Chura Narykov from historical sources and the legendary Chura Batyr were successful warriors and great patriots. During the Kazan-Moscow war in the 1530s, the historical Chura acted at the head of a large Tatar-Mari army in the Galician and Kostroma borders. At the same time, he was in opposition to the Crimean dynasty ruling in Kazan and advocated more constructive relations with a strong Moscow. In 1546, after the overthrow of Khan, Safa-Girey joined the government and supported the compromise candidacy of Khan Shah-Ali from Kasimov. After Safa-Girey returned to the throne, he was executed. The legendary Chura Batyr himself was from the Crimea, but considered Shah Ali his sovereign. Just like the real prototype, he fought a lot with Moscow and was invincible until the enemy decided to oppose the hero with his own son. During the battle with his son, Chura-batyr drowns in the waters of Idel, leaving Kazan defenseless.

• Kuchum (d. 1601)

Khan Kuchum is well known as the antagonist of Ermak, but his image is lost somewhere in the crowd among the Tatar army in Surikov’s painting. As if he is part of the “natural chaos” that must be conquered by Russian weapons. In fact, Kuchum’s story is much more similar to the universal plot of “The Return of the King.” A representative of the Chingizid Shibanid dynasty, which ruled in Siberia until the end of the 15th century, he returned to the land of his ancestors and took power from the Taibugid family, which ruled for almost 70 years, from the point of view of Chingizid, illegally. As a legitimate khan, he does not recognize vassal dependence on the Moscow Grand Duke, who has recently called himself tsar. This is precisely what lay at the heart of the conflict. Kuchum's war against the Cossacks of Ermak did not end in 1581 with the occupation of Isker. The resistance continued for another 20 years and cost Ermak his life.

Photo by Mikhail Kozlovsky

In the service of the Russian state

• Khudai-Kul (d. 1523)

After the collapse of the Golden Horde, many Tatar aristocrats went to the service of the Grand Duke of Moscow. They often received high ranks, commanded military units and made a significant contribution to the development of Russia. The fate of the Kazan prince Khudai-Kul, who became Peter Ibrahimovich in Moscow and married Vasily III’s sister Evdokia, is very indicative. He was the son of the Kazan Khan Ibrahim and one of his wives Fatima. Paradoxically, the children of Fatima, led by Khan Ilham (Ali), were irreconcilable towards Moscow, unlike the children of Queen Nur-Sultan. This cost them the throne in Kazan and exile to the north to Beloozero. Having become part of the highest Moscow aristocracy, Khudai-Kul participated in the wars with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and commanded a large regiment in 1510, when the Pskov land was annexed to Moscow. Genghisid was the best friend of Vasily III and, since the prince did not have children for a long time, he even considered him as a possible heir. The Kazan prince was buried in the Archangel Cathedral of the Moscow Kremlin, next to other builders of the Russian state.

• Bayush Razgildeev (late 16th century - early 17th century)

During the Troubles of the early 17th century, when Muscovite Rus' virtually ceased to exist as a single state, many regions of the country were subject to raids from the Nogai Horde. Territories with a Tatar population are no exception. In 1612, the Nogais made another raid on the Alatyr district with a variegated ethnic composition, where Tatars-Mishars, Mordovians-Erzya, and Chuvash lived. But instead of easy profit, an unpleasant surprise awaited the steppe warriors. Murza Bayush Razgildeev gathered “the Alatyr Murzas and Mordovians and all sorts of service people” and defeated the Nogais in the battle of the Pyana River. For this, the government of Prince Pozharsky granted him the princely title. In documents of that time, the Razgildeevs are called both “Mordovian Murzas” and “Tatars” who profess the “infidel faith” (i.e. Islam), which is why every nation considers the hero to be one of their own.

• Ishak Islyamov (1865-1929)

The main merit of this Tatar naval officer can be seen on the map of Russia - this is the Franz Josef Land archipelago, which Islyamov declared Russian territory on August 29, 1914. The uninhabited Arctic islands were discovered and named after their emperor by the Austrians. In 1913, the first Russian expedition to the North Pole, led by Georgy Sedov, disappeared in this area. The steam schooner "Gerta" under the command of Islyamov set out to search. The Sedovites could not be found on Franz Joseph Land: having suffered and buried their captain, they had already gone home. In view of the outbreak of the First World War, where Austria was an enemy of Russia, Islyamov raised the Russian tricolor over Cape Flora. Iskhak Islyamov is the highest-ranking naval officer of the Russian Empire of Tatar origin. He rose to the rank of lieutenant general in the hydrograph corps. Born in Kronstadt, in the family of naval non-commissioned officer Ibragim Islyamov, who presumably came from the village of Aibash, Vysokogorsk region. Ishak Ibrahimovich was a student of Admiral Makarov, took part in maritime research in the North, Far East and Caspian Sea, and participated in the Russian-Japanese War. After the revolution, he supported the whites and emigrated to Turkey. Cape Islyamov is located in Vladivostok on Russky Island.

In defense of the faith of our ancestors

• Kul Sharif (d. 1552)

It often happens in history that when politicians and the military cannot protect society, spiritual authorities come to the fore. This was the case during the Time of Troubles in Russia, when Patriarch Hermogenes, a native of Kazan, acted as a generator of patriotic sentiments. This was the case during the decline of the Kazan Khanate. While various aristocratic parties weaved intrigues, carried out coups and negotiated with external players, the head of the Islamic clergy, Kul Sharif, acted as the guarantor of local interests. It was he who was the first person in the government under the last khan Yadigar-Muhammad, who came from Astrakhan, spent many years in Russian service, and, therefore, did not have such authority among Kazan residents as an Islamic scientist. In 1552, many Tatar feudal lords refused to defend their state, seeking benefits. Kul Sharif, guided by the defense of faith, went to the end and fell in battle along with his shakirds. “In the last years of the Kazan kingdom there was a learned man named Kazy Sherif-kul. When the Russians besieged Kazan, he fought a lot and finally fell dead in his madrassah and was struck by a spear,” Shigabutdin Marjani wrote about him.

Kul Sharif. Photo kazan-kremlin.ru

• Seit Yagafarov (second halfXVIIV.)

In the 17th-18th centuries, Muslims of the Volga and Urals regions had to defend not only their land, but also their religion from the government’s policy of converting all subjects to Christianity. A striking episode of Muslim resistance was the Seitov uprising of 1681-1684, which covered the territory of modern Bashkiria and the eastern regions of Tatarstan. The reason was the royal decree, according to which the Muslim aristocracy was deprived of estates and estates. Local authorities began to force Tatars and Bashkirs to be baptized, which violated the conditions for the Bashkir lands to become part of Russia. The uprising was led by Seit Yagafarov, who was proclaimed khan under the name Safar. The rebels kept Ufa and Menzelinsk under siege and attacked Samara. The government made concessions and declared an amnesty, after which some of the rebels laid down their arms. But Yagafarov continued to resist in alliance with the Kalmyks. The disturbed confessional balance was temporarily restored.

• Batyrsha (1710-1762)

Muslim theologian and imam Gabdulla Galiev, nicknamed Batyrsha, spoke out in defense of Islam at a time when the persecution of Muslims in the Russian Empire reached its peak. In 1755-1756 he led a large armed uprising in Bashkiria. Once in prison, he did not stop fighting and wrote the message “Takhrizname” to Empress Elizabeth Petrovna, which became a manifesto of the religious and civil rights of the Tatars and Bashkirs. He died in the Shlisselburg fortress while trying to escape, when he managed to get an ax in his chained hands. Despite the defeat of the uprising of 1755-1756, its result was a gradual transition of the Russian Empire to a policy of religious tolerance.

On opposite sides of the barricades and the front line

• Ilyas Alkin (1895-1937)

A military and political organizer who wanted the Tatars to play an independent role in the cataclysms of the early 20th century. Born into a Tatar noble family. His father was a deputy of the State Duma, and his grandfather was the chief of police in Kazan. Like many young people of the early 20th century, he was passionate about socialist ideas. He was a member of the Menshevik Party and then the Socialist Revolutionaries. In 1915 he was drafted into the army. After the February Revolution, he initiated the creation of Muslim military units and, despite his young age, was elected chairman of the All-Russian Muslim Military Council (Harbi Shuro). He did not accept the October Revolution. At the beginning of 1918, he was the main figure in the 2nd All-Russian Muslim Congress in Kazan, where the proclamation of the Idel-Ural State was being prepared. At this time, in the Tatar part of Kazan, power structures parallel to the Bolsheviks operated, which were called the “Zabulachnaya Republic”. After the liquidation of the “Zabulachnaya Republic” and arrest, he participated in the Civil War as part of the Bashkir troops. First on the side of the Whites, and then, together with the Bashkir corps, he went over to the side of Soviet power. He was repeatedly arrested and executed during the Great Terror.

• Yakub Chanyshev (1892-1987)

The military biography of Lieutenant General Chanyshev is the history of the Red and Soviet armies, lived by a Tatar. He came from a noble Tatar family of princes Chanyshev, in 1913 he was drafted into the army and served as an artilleryman in the First World War. With the beginning of the revolution, he supported the Muslim military organization Kharbi Shuro, but then for the rest of his life he linked his fate with the Bolshevik Party. He took part in the October battles in Kazan and in the defeat of the “Zabulachnaya Republic”, and personally arrested its leader Ilyas Alkin. Then there was the Civil War against Kolchak and the fight against the Basmachi in Central Asia. The career red officer did not escape the wave of repression. However, after being under investigation for a year and a half, Chanyshev was released. He met the Great Patriotic War near Kharkov in 1942 and ended it in the Reichstag, where he left his signature. After retiring, he took an active part in Tatar public life. He fought for the rehabilitation of the name of Ismail Gasprinsky and the return of Asadullaev’s house to the Tatar community of Moscow.

Yakub Chanyshev. Photo archive.gov.tatarstan.ru

• Yakub Yuzefovich (1872-1929)

Polish-Lithuanian Tatars are an ethnic group living in Poland, Lithuania and Belarus. It would not be an exaggeration to say that among this people the military traditions of the Golden Horde were preserved for the longest time. Their ancestors came to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania with Khan Tokhtamysh and became part of the Polish gentry. From this people came a prominent military figure in the Russian Imperial Army and the White movement, Lieutenant General Yakov (Yakub) Yuzefovich. He was born in the Belarusian Grodno, studied at the Polotsk Cadet Corps and the Mikhailovsky Artillery School in St. Petersburg. In the Russo-Japanese War, he received the Order of St. Anne, 3rd degree, for distinction in the battles near Mukden. The promising officer begins the First World War at the Headquarters of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, but a paper career was not to the liking of the descendant of the warlike Horde. A month later, he was transferred from Headquarters to the position of chief of staff of the Caucasian Native Cavalry Division, which united people from different peoples of the Caucasus under its banners and bore the unofficial name of the “Wild Division.” In battles he repeatedly risked his life and was wounded. During the Civil War, Yuzefovich was the closest ally and right hand of Baron Peter Wrangel. Fights the Bolsheviks in the Caucasus, near Kiev, near Orel and in the Crimea. After the defeat of the White Army, he lived in exile.

In the fire of mankind's greatest war

• Alexander Matrosov (1924-1943)

Shakiryan Yunusovich Mukhamedyanov - this, according to one version, was the name of Red Army soldier Alexander Matrosov, who on February 27, 1943, covered the embrasure of a German machine gun with his body and, at the cost of his life, helped his comrades complete a combat mission. The fate of Matrosov-Mukhamedyanov reflected the life path of an entire generation during times of devastation. He was a homeless child (it was at this time that he took the name with which he went down in history), sat in a colony, took the outbreak of the war as a personal challenge, asked to go to the front and died a hero.

• Gani Safiullin (1905-1973)

The honored Soviet military leader was born in Zakazanye, in the village of Stary Kishit, and studied at a madrasah - a typical biography of many Tatar boys of the early 20th century. But the Civil War, famine and devastation made adjustments to this fate. Life brought Gani to the Kazakh steppes, and from there to the Cossack regiment. Once in the Red Army, Safiullin fought the Basmachi in Central Asia, guarded strategic targets, but the finest hour, where he showed his talent as a commander, was the war with Nazi Germany. His military path went through the Battle of Smolensk, the unsuccessful offensive near Kharkov in 1942, and the Battle of Stalingrad. In September 1943, the 25th Guards Rifle Corps under the command of Safiullin crossed the Dnieper. Reflecting numerous enemy counterattacks, the Tatar commander’s fighters expanded the bridgehead on the right bank of the river to 25 km wide and 15 km deep. A month later he was awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union. In 1945, he was appointed to command the 57th Guards Rifle Corps. From near Prague the corps was transferred to the Far East to defeat the Japanese Kwantung Army. After leaving the reserve, Lieutenant General Safiullin lived in Kazan.

• Maguba Syrtlanova (1912-1971)

The U-2 biplane, despite the nickname “maize,” was a formidable weapon in the mountains of the Great Patriotic War and was in service with the 46th Guards Taman Women’s Aviation Regiment of night bombers. Almost silent planes appeared suddenly and caused colossal damage to the enemy, for which the Germans nicknamed the pilots on the “whatnots” night witches. Maguba Syrtlanova fell ill with aviation long before the war, studied at a flight school and constantly improved her skills. In the summer of 1941, she was drafted into the air ambulance, but tried to get into the 46th regiment. Soon she became a guard senior lieutenant and deputy squadron commander. During the war, Syrtlanova made 780 combat missions and dropped 84 tons of bombs. Other pilots admired the punctuality and reliability of their combat friend. It ended the war in the skies over defeated Germany. In 1946, Syrtlanova was awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union. In the post-war years, the former “night witch” lived in Kazan.

Flight book of Maguba Syrtlanova

• Makhmut Gareev (born 1923)

The Great Patriotic War became the first test for the honored Soviet military leader, Army General Makhmut Gareev. After studying for only five months at the Tashkent Infantry School, Gareev asked to go to the front and in 1942 he ended up in the notorious Rzhev direction. He managed to survive, but was wounded, despite which he continued to command. Like many fighters, Gareev’s war did not end in Europe, but continued in the Far East. Then the general’s record includes the position of military adviser in the United Arab Republic (which included Egypt and Syria), work under the President of Afghanistan Najibullah after the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the country. But the main calling of my whole life is military science, where the theory is supported by my own combat experience.

• Gainan Kurmashev (1919-1944)

The name of Gainan Kurmashev is in the shadow of the poet-hero Musa Jalil, meanwhile, he was the head of the underground cell in the Volga-Tatar Legion, and the Nazis entitled the death sentence to the members of the organization “Kurmashev and ten others.” The future hero was born in the north of Kazakhstan in Aktyubinsk. I went to study in the Mari Republic at the Paranga Pedagogical College. The Paranginsky district is an area of ​​compact residence of Tatars, and for some time it was even officially called the Tatar district. In Paranga he worked as a teacher, but returned to Kazakhstan in 1937 so as not to fall under the machine of repression for his kulak origin. Participated in the Soviet-Finnish war. In 1942, while carrying out a reconnaissance mission on enemy territory, he was captured. Having joined the legion created by the Germans, he organized subversive work, as a result of which the 825th Tatar battalion went over to the side of the Belarusian partisans. After the organization was exposed, he was executed along with other underground fighters on August 25, 1944.

• Musa Jalil (1906-1944)

The life path of Musa Jalil - the path of a poet, soldier and freedom fighter, rightfully makes him the most recognizable Tatar hero of the turbulent twentieth century. His war poetry from the “Moabit Notebook” is known better than “Idegey” and “Chura-Batyr”. He is, of course, the most prominent member of the underground group in the Volga-Tatar Legion and the voice of all prisoners of war, whose quiet heroism did not fit into the official Stalinist understanding of the war. Jalil is clearer and closer to modern people than the epic heroes of the past, but his lines sometimes sound like medieval dastans.

Photo by Dmitry Reznov

Hiking again

• Marat Akhmetshin (1980-2016)

Palmyra became the ideological stage of the Syrian war. Militants from Daesh, banned in Russia, staged demonstration executions in the ancient amphitheater. In response to the barbaric methods of terrorists, on May 5, 2016, against the backdrop of the surviving treasures of the world's architectural heritage, the orchestra conducted by Valery Gergiev gave a symphony concert. And on June 3, 2016, near Palmyra, a mortally wounded officer was found holding a grenade without a pin in his hand. The earth was burning all around. This officer was 35-year-old captain Marat Akhmetshin, whose family remained in Kazan. It is known that that day he was left alone with two hundred militants and fought to the last. Akhmetshin is a third generation military man. Graduated from the Kazan Artillery School. He served in Kabardino-Balkaria and at a military base in Armenia, and visited the zone of the Georgian-Ossetian conflict. In 2010, after the disbandment of the unit, he retired to the reserve, but was reinstated in the army six months before his death. A Russian Tatar warrior was buried in the village of Atabaevo on the Kama River. For his feat he was awarded the title of Hero of Russia.

Mark Shishkin

Where the term “Tatars” originally came from - the first answers were good. But here we should remember the further development of the Golden Horde. It was a huge empire, stretching in the west from the Crimea and the southeastern territories of Ukraine to the Caucasus and Central Asia in the south, and Western Siberia in the East. The question is: how could it exist at all and not fall apart immediately? But because there were unifying factors specific to the Ulus of Jochi (the rest of the former territories of the Mongol Empire also had their own):

Turkic peoples lived throughout the territory of the Golden Horde. Nomadic, or recently formerly so. The differences in language among the majority were not critical; so they were basically mutually intelligible. The Old Turkic language, or Turki, was used as a communication and official language, in different versions. Which, at the very least, the Polovtsians (the main ancestors of the Crimean Tatars) could understand; and ancestors of the Uzbeks; and Bulgars from the Volga region; and those Turks who settled in the Caucasus, etc.

Yes, like nomads, a huge part of the population had no fundamental contradictions, as such, with the Mongols. They fit perfectly into the Mongolian fighting machine. The Mongols were initially a minority. Quite quickly they assimilated among the surrounding Turkic population.

Soon Islam was adopted as the official religion. This strengthened the sympathy for the country of those who found themselves on the territory of Z.O. Muslim Turks from the Volga region and Central Asia. Their culture and socio-economic structure were a kind of cementing factor. And they allowed many non-sedentary peoples to develop simultaneously.

Both non-Turkic and non-Muslim peoples lived in the Ulus of Jochi. Let's say, numerous Finno-Ugric ones, or those who lived in the North Caucasus. But it was the Turks who professed Islam (both nomadic and sedentary) who were satisfied with almost everything in such an empire; They eventually began to perceive it as “their” state, and to support and protect it. It was possible to create a certain community within the framework of such an empire.

For the Russians of the 13th-15th centuries, however, there was no particular difference between the Mongols and the Turks. There were simply those evil spirits of oriental appearance, speaking an incomprehensible language, who came on horseback to collect tribute, and periodically staged raids. He continued to call them the same word under which information about the Mongols initially spread in horror throughout all surrounding countries.

After the Golden Horde finally collapsed, for the Russian people the Turks on horseback, professing Islam, with whom they had to fight as they defeated the next Khanate, were still “Tatars”. Moreover, horsemen who believed in Allah and spoke dialects indistinguishable to the Slavic ear actually appeared from both Crimea and Western Siberia. And then, as the country expanded and the Russian Empire was created, the rule spread to almost all Turkic peoples. Roman wrote: “In general, “Tatars” in Russian are something like “Germans” (those who do not speak an understandable language, that is, “dumb”, unable to speak humanly), this is not the name of any specific people, and a general term for “foreign”, nomadic and semi-nomadic tribes from somewhere in the East.” - but after all, Tatars were also called, for example, not at all nomadic Azerbaijanis - “Transcaucasian Tatars”. (This is what the brain takes away while reading fiction of the 19th century related to the Caucasus). Karachais - “Mountain Tatars”, Nogais - “Nogai Tatars”, Khakass - “Abakan Tatars”, etc. In the story “The Enchanted Wanderer” by N. Leskov, Tatars mean Kazakhs. Even though few of them called themselves that, and the differences between, say, Karachais and Chulyms are enormous.

Historically, several peoples still accepted the word as the official name of the ethnic group: Volga Tatars, Crimean Tatars, and Siberian Tatars. And then, this finally happened only in the 20th century.

So initially, we can say that when the Mongols first invaded the territory of the Russian principalities, the Tatars were not among them either in the original (exterminated Mongol tribe) or in the subsequent sense. But when the state of Ulus Jochi - the Golden Horde - appeared, through which, first of all, the so-called yoke was carried out, the majority of the population there very quickly became Tatars.

I will supplement the previous excellent answer of Roman Khmelevsky with a remark to the second part of your question. The fact is that the term “yoke” is the traditional name of the system of relationships that developed between the Jochi ulus and the Russian principalities in the 13th-15th centuries. Moreover, the term itself has a relatively late origin and was first used by the Polish chronicler Jan Dlugosz in the 15th century. In Russia, the term “yoke” appears no earlier than the middle of the 17th century, and the expression “Mongol-Tatar yoke” itself was first used in 1817 by the German author Christian Kruse in the “Atlas of European History.” Thus, to designate the medieval state of the nomadic Mongols, the term “yoke” is not applicable; it is used only to designate the relations that developed between them and the ancient Russian lands (and at present, the correctness of its use - not the phenomenon itself, but precisely the term “yoke” - is put under doubt).

As for the term "Golden Horde", it is a little more complicated. Traditionally, this name is used in historiography to designate the state formation of the nomadic Mongols, which existed since the 30s. XIII approximately to the end of the XV century. The word "horde" is of Turkic origin (from ordu - fortified military camp) and at that time it meant the khan's headquarters, the place of residence of the commander-in-chief. It was first used by Ibn Battuta, an Arab traveler of the 14th century, as he called the golden tent of the Uzbek Khan. It caught on quite quickly, especially since it was quite appropriate in the context of the Mongol tradition to designate the main and secondary headquarters of the khans. So, after the conquest of the territories included in the Jochi ulus (the inheritance of Genghis Khan’s eldest son, who was supposed to conquer it for himself), it was divided into several appanages, which were headed by the grandchildren of Genghis - Batu’s part was called the White Horde, and his older brother’s part was called the Blue Horde (in the Mongolian tradition, white denoted the west, blue denoted the east). But they themselves did not call their state, which separated from the Great Khan by the middle of the 13th century, the Golden Horde - they simply called it “ulus”, a state, adding to it various epithets (the word “ulug”, great, or the name of an active or famous person in the past khan). However, the name "Golden Horde" seems correct, because has long been accepted in historical science. A parallel can be drawn with Byzantium - this state itself was never called that (although this name was sometimes used by the Romans to sublimely name Constantinople), but in modern historiography this designation is most common for the Eastern Roman Empire, and even the science of it is called Byzantine studies.

I agree with the author above. The issue with the Tatars among the Mongols is very muddy. But in short, it goes like this:
There were Mongols, there were Tatars. There was a man named Esigei, who at first simply fought with his brave horsemen, then decided to unite all the territories north of China, inhabited by nomads, whom the Chinese themselves called “black Mongols,” while the “whites” were assimilated in the northern provinces. And within the Black Mongols there was a division directly into the Mongols and those who are commonly called Tatars. And so the brave Esigei-baatur with his allies killed all their enemies, including the Tatars, and for the first time in history united Mongolia. But the Mongol savages of that time did not know the word “honor,” and very soon Esigei, who spent the night with the Tatars on his way home, was poisoned. Then the hunt began for his family, but now the main thing for us is that a boy named Temujin, who saw the Tatars slaughter everything he loved, survived. Then he grew up, found those who remained faithful to his father and declared war on the Tatars, whom he considered guilty (rightly) of his father’s death. Everything was decided in one big battle, at night, when Temujin managed to defeat the united Tatar army and took many soldiers prisoner. You yourself understand that it is better not to give exact figures here, because everything will be a lie. So Temujin became Genghis Khan, and the Tatars were forcibly poured into the Mongol army.
What was I leading to all this? What I meant by this was that prisoners, according to Mongolian military traditions, always marched as infantry in the vanguard and died very quickly, because death awaited them on both sides: both in front and behind the Mongols, if they decided to retreat. So we can safely say that by the time of the campaign of Genghis Khan’s grandson Batu against Rus' and Europe, there were few original Tatars in the army, and those that remained, through their service and loyalty, achieved commanding ranks among the Mongols and were finally assimilated among their conquerors.

There is a complex and confusing story here. Firstly, the “Tatars” in the “Tatar-Mongol yoke” are, in general, not at all the same “Tatars” that are in today’s Kazan and Tatarstan, and this creates the first confusion. The Tatars in Tatarstan are rather the descendants of the population of the Volga Bulgaria, partly the Polovtsians, they have always lived there on the Volga, and have nothing to do with the Mongol tribes (although, of course, a lot has mixed there since then, as elsewhere). During the period of the Golden Horde (Ulus Jushi), these Tatars, like many other peoples, were part of it.

Those “Tatars” who are “Mongol-Tatars” were a Mongol tribe subjugated at one time by Genghis Khan (Temüjin), and, in the process of subjugation, practically destroyed and assimilated (there is a long story why this is so, they killed Temujin’s father and he took revenge ).

In general, “Tatars” in Russian are something like “Germans” (those who do not speak an understandable language, that is, “dumb”, unable to speak humanly), this is not the name of a specific people, but a general term for "alien", nomadic and semi-nomadic tribes from somewhere in the East.2. Even before Genghis Khan, the Tatars were numerous and formed tribal associations: Otuz Tatars (thirty Tatar tribes) and Tokuz Tatars (nine Tatar tribes). This is written on the monument to Kul-Tegin, the Turkic commander. There is no evidence that Genghis Khan destroyed all 39 Tatar tribes.
3. The Tatars were Turkic-speaking - on the Kul-Tegin monument they are described as Turks. Later, after mixing with Mongol-speaking peoples, they adopted their language.
4. The Mongols of the Middle Ages are mainly Turks and they have nothing to do with the modern Mongols (Khalkhas). The fact that Genghis Khan was a Khalkha Mongol can be successfully refuted on the grounds that he spoke not Mongolian, but Tatar. This is evidenced by the story of the Flemish monk - Franciscan Guillaume de Rubruk, who at one time visited the headquarters of Khan Batu. Rubruk retells a widespread parable of that time. A certain Arab who came to the headquarters of Mengu Khan (one of the grandchildren of the Shaker of the Universe) began to describe his dream to him, saying that he dreamed of Genghis Khan, who demanded that Muslims in his domain be executed everywhere.
And then Mengu Khan asked the Arab: “What language did my illustrious ancestor speak to you?” “In Arabic,” was the answer. “So you’re lying all the time,” Mengu Khan became angry. “My ancestor didn’t know any other language except Tatar.”
And Rashid ad-Din gives this same story almost identically in his “Collection of Chronicles”.

Answer

Comment